When I started to read this, it had the look of something bogus---navigating around the first page, I clicked on HOMEPAGE and found info on Mr. Loflin. So I assumed all that verbiage I had just read from "Anis Shorrosh" was actually Mr. Loflin's, using a fictitious Muslim personage to make the points of what is already semi-successfully being carried out for the legitimization of Islam in this, OUR country. Then with a heavy heart I saw that there was indeed a real Dr. Anis Shorrosh, and that there were so many points at which his scenario for Islamic takeover has already been satisfied in our ongoing daily life, that it seemed like he may be some kind of blueprint-maker, or grey eminence behind the takeover. Funny thing is, I googled the anme, and he is described elsewhere on the Intenet as a CHRISTIAN missionary, and in one printed "debate", he represents the CHRISTIAN viewpoint over and against another participant who represents the Islamic viewpoint. So unless Anis Shorrosh is a very carefully crafted internet FICTION , this is a very central figure in all the stuff we have got to worry about.
Let's expose him in some way. He seems to me to represent the very face of insidiousness, the brains behind the infiltration.
BTT
BTT
Interesting.....the steps are taking place no matter who wrote it.......
What do you suggest? You did some research on this....very interesting viewpoint. Why wouldn't he just be a "whistleblower" sounding the warning bell?
Shorosh says, right in the article, that he is coming from an ARAB-CHRISTIAN perspective. He is very upfront about who he is, whether you agree or not with what he is saying. Read more carefully next time.
Anis Shorrosh is a Palestinian who came to Christ back in the 1950s or 60s.
Check this out......
Three Cheers for Australia!
Muslims who want to live under Islamic Sharia law were told on Wednesday (15 Feb 06) to
get out of Australia, as the government targeted radicals in a bid to head off
potential terror attacks. A day after a group of mainstream Muslim leaders
pledged loyalty to Australia at a special meeting with Prime Minister John
Howard, he and his ministers made it clear that extremists would face a crackdown.
Treasurer Peter Costello, seen as heir apparent to Howard hinted that some
radical clerics could be asked to leave the country if they did not accept that
Australia was a secular state and its laws were made by parliament. "If those
are not your values, if you want a country which has Sharia law or a
theocratic state, then Australia is not for you," he said on national television.
"I'd be saying to clerics who are teaching that there are two laws governing
people in Australia, one the Australian law and another the Islamic law, that
is false. If you can't agree with parliamentary law, independent courts,
democracy, and would prefer Sharia law and have the opportunity to go to another
country, which practices it, perhaps, then, that's a better option," Costello
said.
Asked whether he meant radical clerics would be forced to leave, he said
those with dual citizenship could possibly be asked to move to the other country.
Education Minister Brendan Nelson later told reporters that Muslims who did
not want to accept local values should "clear off".
"Basically, people who don't want to be Australians, and they don't want to
live by Australian values and understand them, well then they can basically
clear off," he said. Separately, Howard angered some Australian Muslims on
Wednesday by saying he supported spy agencies monitoring the nation's mosques.