Posted on 02/17/2006 8:01:45 PM PST by Mia T
Seeing how close that traitor Kerry came I don't think you could count Hillary out.
There you go, folks. Who could doubt this man's qualifications to be the next president of the United States?
In addition to these sterling attributes, Rudy also:
I predict a massive heart attack.
"The people who are worrying about that should stop worrying. "
I wouldn't stop worrying until AFTER she looses in 08. She is very dangerous and I wouldn't slight herin the least. We do so at our own peril.
The ONLY real issue is terrorism and on that end rudy is excellent. As president he wont have any real say in changing gun laws .
Two questions for you, Binkdeville:
1. Why is Rudy "excellent"?
2. Wouldn't Mike Pence or George Allen be just as, if not more, capable than Giuliani?
...by the way, with a pistol barrel held against my head I wouldn't vote for Rudy Giuliani.
He is.
I googled mike pence. mikepence.com says he's from the 6th cong dist of KY. All other references say he is from 6th cong dist of IN. Is he lost?
Please nobody listen to Bill. Let her run.
I see no reference to Kentucky at www.mikepence.com
Matter of fact, directly under About Mike one will find Indiana's 6th District.
By the way, deBuillion...The aforementioned site is Mike's committee's, his congressional site is:
Thank you for your interest.
This is what shows up if , like I said , you google mike pence, jla.
Another "What a great post" BUMP!
hey FReeperFRiend , ya mean[?] it would be like Rolling Stones lore ,...
... "was it Mick or Keith? Who pushed Brian into the pool?"
so , with Sir Edmund Hillary Clinton ,which one of her cadre[?], who could get Bubba over to the hotel room window?
perhaps in Europe , out for a moonlight cruise.......
I think you're right. Under the right circumstances, she could win.
2008 is a ways off. A lot of things could change between now and then.
Better to keep your guard up then get sucker punched.
I'll check back Monday.
(I never realized how hard it would be coming up with a reasonable and cogent reply as to why Rudy's qualified to be POTUS)
You have to admit that the Clintons have been good for the Republican Party starting in 1993.
Personally can't see what Giuliani would bring to the table in terms of leadership. The only way Hillary has a shot is if the GOP runs some milquetoast who doesn't take border security and immigration reform seriously. Why take away from the gains made in the USSC by putting a liberal in office?
I think he's a liability even in a VP role. Why fight a New York liberal with another New York liberal?
Also... Middle America has some real problems that will take some real leadership to solve. I don't think another 'coastie' is the answer. Tancredo and Pence would be the fore-runners here.
Some Giuliani 'food-for-thought':
"Giuliani took part in a homosexual pride parade that included a contingent of pedophile activists marching behind a banner for NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association)." - excerpt
http://www.cultureandfamily.org/articledisplay.asp?id=318&department=CFI&categoryid=cfreport
West Coast Catholics aren't buying in on his abortion stance.
http://www.catholicexchange.com/vm/index.asp?vm_id=1&art_id=29509
Apparently hellbent Palestinians don't really kill people, guns do.
http://www.cnn.com/US/9702/24/empire.shoot/
Giuliani fought to protect foodstamp entitlements for illegal aliens.
http://www.cnn.com/US/9610/11/immigration.suit/
I'm sure there's more where this came from; I'm just too nauseous to keep looking.
I would so love to believe she has no chance of ever winning the presidency, but those who underestimate the power of evil--especially as manifested in this woman and her husband--do so at their own peril. I remember people guffawing in '92 at the very notion that Bill Clinton could ever be president. I remember people giving ironclad guarantees that Bill Clinton would never ever be re-elected.
If you want to know the deciding factor on whether she'll be president, listen closely. Here it comes: IF we've weakened the power of the MSM enough, she won't be. IF we have not, she'll win. That's it. When the campaigns get going, the MSM will launch a propaganda campaign of their own, the scope of which has never existed in our earthly history. This woman is gonna take the perfect sounding position on every key issue; she's shown over and again that she's not bound by ANY constraints of truth. The MSM will do everything within its power to make the public believe the illusion.
There's no doubt that we've weakened the MSM. In a little over two years, we'll find out how much.
MM
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.