Replies

Personally can't see what Giuliani would bring to the table in terms of leadership. The only way Hillary has a shot is if the GOP runs some milquetoast who doesn't take border security and immigration reform seriously. Why take away from the gains made in the USSC by putting a liberal in office?

I think he's a liability even in a VP role. Why fight a New York liberal with another New York liberal?

Also... Middle America has some real problems that will take some real leadership to solve. I don't think another 'coastie' is the answer. Tancredo and Pence would be the fore-runners here.

Some Giuliani 'food-for-thought':

"Giuliani took part in a homosexual “pride” parade that included a contingent of pedophile activists marching behind a banner for NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association)." - excerpt

http://www.cultureandfamily.org/articledisplay.asp?id=318&department=CFI&categoryid=cfreport

West Coast Catholics aren't buying in on his abortion stance.

http://www.catholicexchange.com/vm/index.asp?vm_id=1&art_id=29509

Apparently hellbent Palestinians don't really kill people, guns do.

http://www.cnn.com/US/9702/24/empire.shoot/

Giuliani fought to protect foodstamp entitlements for illegal aliens.

http://www.cnn.com/US/9610/11/immigration.suit/

I'm sure there's more where this came from; I'm just too nauseous to keep looking.

Don't fret none, the primaries will prove to be the downfall of any attempted run by the likes of a Rudy Giuliani.
He will garner nothing more than a gaping yawn in Dixie and the West.

Why take away from the gains made in the USSC by putting a liberal in office?

What gains? It's still 5.1/2-3.1/2 against the Constitution.