Posted on 02/16/2006 1:40:18 PM PST by Stellar Dendrite
The Bush administration on Thursday rebuffed criticism about potential security risks of a $6.8 billion sale that gives a company in the United Arab Emirates control over significant operations at six major American ports.
Lawmakers asked the White House to reconsider its earlier approval of the deal.
The sale to state-owned Dubai Ports World was "rigorously reviewed" by a U.S. committee that considers security threats when foreign companies seek to buy or invest in American industry, National Security Council spokesman Frederick Jones said.
The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, run by the Treasury Department, reviewed an assessment from U.S. intelligence agencies. The committee's 12 members agreed unanimously the sale did not present any problems, the department said.
"We wanted to look at this one quite closely because it relates to ports," Stewart Baker, an assistant secretary in the Homeland Security Department, told The Associated Press. "It is important to focus on this partner as opposed to just what part of the world they come from. We came to the conclusion that the transaction should not be halted."
The unusual defense of the secretive committee, which reviews hundreds of such deals each year, came in response to criticism about the purchase of London-based Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co.
The world's fourth-largest ports company runs commercial operations at shipping terminals in New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia.
Four senators and three House members asked the administration Thursday to reconsider its approval. The lawmakers contended the UAE is not consistent in its support of U.S. terrorism-fighting efforts.
"The potential threat to our country is not imagined, it is real," Rep. Mark Foley, R-Fla., said in a House speech.
The Homeland Security Department said it was legally impossible under the committee's rules to reconsider its approval without evidence DP World gave false information or withheld vital details from U.S. officials. The 30-day window for the committee to voice objections has ended.
DP World said it had received all regulatory approvals.
"We intend to maintain and, where appropriate, enhance current security arrangements," the company said in a statement. "It is very much business as usual for the P&O terminals" in the United States.
In Dubai, the UAE's foreign minister described his country as an important U.S. ally but declined to respond directly to the concerns expressed in Washington.
"We have worked very closely with the United States on a number of issues relating to the combat of terrorism, prior to and post Sept. 11," Sheik Abdullah Bin Zayed al-Nahyan told The Associated Press.
U.S. lawmakers said the UAE was an important transfer point for shipments of smuggled nuclear components sent to Iran, North Korea and Libya by a Pakistani scientist, Abdul Qadeer Khan. They also said the UAE was one of only three countries to recognize the now-toppled Taliban as Afghanistan's legitimate government.
The State Department describes the UAE as a vital partner in the fight against terrorism. Dubai's own ports have participated since last year in U.S. efforts to detect illegal shipments of nuclear materials.
Rep. Vito Fossella, R-N.Y., urged congressional hearings on the deal.
"At a time when America is leading the world in the war on terrorism and spending billions of dollars to secure our homeland, we cannot cede control of strategic assets to foreign nations with spotty records on terrorism," Fossella said.
Critics also have cited the UAE's history as an operational and financial base for the hijackers who carried out the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
"Outsourcing the operations of our largest ports to a country with a dubious record on terrorism is a homeland security and commerce accident waiting to happen," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y. "The administration needs to take another look at this deal."
Separately, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey said Thursday it will conduct its own review of the deal and urged the government to defend its decision.
In a letter to the Treasury Department, Port Authority chairman Anthony Coscia said the independent review by his agency was necessary "to protect its interests."
The lawmakers pressing the White House to reconsider included Sens. Schumer, Tom Coburn, R-Okla., Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., and Chris Dodd, D-Conn., and Reps. Foley, Fossella and Chris Shays, R-Conn.
So it was just chest pounding BS....
When Michael Savage and Chuck Schumer agree, then it is very serious!
I say this is so STUPID....nut the bast%%d who approved it, even if it means good ol' G. Bush himself!
No, just those who THINK Islam is controlling our ports is an idiot. Thus, you are an idiot.
UAE is on a spending spree!
United Arab Emirates-based media investment company Istithmar PJSC, through $2 billion in participation notes issued by UBS AG, now controls 2.39 percent of Time Warner Inc.‘s (NYSE:TWX - news) stock and has hired one of Carl Icahn‘s entities as its advisor, according to a regulatory filing on Thursday.
The notes give Istithmar effective control over and economic exposure to over 109 million Time Warner shares, the filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Securities and Exchange Commission said.
Under the agreement, UBS does not have economic exposure or control over the shares.
Only reactionaries like you are idiots.
missed one more
UAE and Kazakhstan sign accord on cooperation
BUMP
BUMP
Quite a few here seem to think he's just a meat puppet for a larger agenda.
It is painful to find myself in agreement with Schumer on anything. I think this decision is truly insane. I don't care what the rationale is- I usually support the adminstration- but this idea is just asking for trouble.
No doubt Schumer is just being Anti-Bush. What has he ever done to improve the safety of the nation?
Nevertheless, this is a monumentally boneheaded idea.
bookmk ping ,[and quite convoluted]
... I'll listen to John Gambling today...
... I don't think he'll let this story "go away"...
... Bloomberg will be on today , and Mayor Mike has more warts than usual on public display,as of late
FYI, baseballmom
El presidente is an internationalist, period. With Bush, maintaining cordial relations with the Arab sultans apparently counts for more than retaining our sovereignty.
Maybe we should also have them run Homeland Security?
Yes, but Haliburton seemed to carry more baggage than hiring a potential terrorist conduit.
Whew what a rant and one that is filled with ignorance. DP World is not in control of port security, what they are doing is buying the contract from a British country for American longshoremen to operate the cranes and unload ships, but what the hey you only know one thing, knee jerk ranting, IMO.
Are the same senators that are opposed to this the same ones that are giving Bush grief about wiretapping?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.