We aren't at war with Islam, either. There are more than 1 billion moslems in the world. What percentage of them are strapping on the vests and blowing people up?
It always seems as though history has stopped at whatever moment we are at. Today, almost all of the wars across the globe have at least one side that is Islamic. Therefore, Islam is a religion of war and destruction.
If this were 1917, then the logical conclusion would be that Christianity is the religon of psychopathic maniacs.
lol
Islam declared war on us. Do you understand the concept of Darul Harb (house of war)?
If not please read this:
There are more than 1 billion moslems in the world. What percentage of them are strapping on the vests and blowing people up?
Considering around half their populations are oppressed by their own and lack rights (women, ahmadis, shia in KSA etc) a sizeable proportions of their population is too young to act, and many others are simply too poor, trying to earn enough to stay alive, or lack the means to fight, the numbers will reflect this and will always be debatable.
Of those who are stupid enough to admit how they feel to a kuffar pollster, this poll may give you some insight as to how they think:
UK poll: 37% of Muslims in Britain think British Jews are a "legitimate target"
Why do they think this way? Could it be because of Islam??
"Mainstream" Islamic site "Islam Q+A": KILL THE JEWS
Finally, although the Muslims nowadays are in a position of weakness and humiliation – because they have turned away from their religion – and are unable to fight the Jews, take back their stolen lands and impose the rule of Islamic sharee’ah in Palestine, this does not mean that this will always be the case until the end of the world. Things have to change, and one of the indications of this is the hadeeth of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), who informed us of some things that are to happen in the future. He was supported by Revelation from his Lord; he did not speak of his own whims and desires, but of that which was revealed to him. He said:Other British and Pakistani based muslims clarift the true meaning of JIHAD:“You will fight the Jews and will prevail over them, so that a rock will say, ‘O Muslim! There is Jew behind me, kill him!’” (Reported by Muslim, 2921; al-Bukhaari, 2926).
According to a report narrated by Muslim from Abu Hurayrah, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “The Hour [the Day of Judgement] will not begin until the Muslims fight the Jews and kill them. A Jew will hide behind a rock or a tree, and the rock or tree will say, ‘O Muslim, O slave of Allaah! There is a Jew behind me, come and kill him!’ – except for the gharqad (box thorn), for it is one of the trees of the Jews.” (Reported by Muslim, 2922).
...the importance, reward and requirement for the Muslims to perform Jihaad Fi Sabeel Lillah i.e. physical struggle:If this were 1917, then the logical conclusion would be that Christianity is the religon of psychopathic maniacs....the saying and actions of Muhammad (Salalahu Alaihi Wasallam) show that Jihaad definitely is to start (offensive) fighting the kuffar to make the Words of Allah the highest and to propagate (da’wa) the call of Islam. Muhammad (Salalahu Alaihi Wasallam) said:
"I have been ordered to fight the people until they bear witness that, ‘there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is His Messenger’ and they establish the prayer and the zakat. And if they do this, then from me is protected their blood and their wealth except by the right granted by Allah."As for his (Salalahu Alaihi Wasallam) actions, they are full of actions that show Jihaad is to start the fighting. So when he went out to Badr to take the caravan belonging to the Quraysh, this was going out to fight, this is offensive – as Muhammad (Salalahu Alaihi Wasallam) initiated the action before the Quraysh. Likewise, when Muhammad (Salalahu Alaihi Wasallam) invaded Hawazin in the battle of Hunayn, when he (Salalahu Alaihi Wasallam) seiged Ta’if and the battle of Mutah to fight the Romans and the Battle of Tabuk – all of these are evidences to show that Jihaad is to start fighting kuffar (offensive). This should clarify the erroneous view that in origin Jihaad is defensive...
How is this the "logical conclusion?" Do you think the same should be true for WWII? Were the great powers of the west fighting each other for Christ? Did the gunners on allied warships blast the enemy to death screaming "Jesus akhbar?"
You see the acts, but do not take into consideration the motivations behind the acts.
1917? What is the significance? WW1 was 1914-1918.
1917 Was the 'glorious bolshevik revolution' ...
What percentage of them actively and openly oppose the bombers?
All it means is that a small percentage are actually faithful to the fundamentals of their religion