Posted on 02/12/2006 4:28:09 PM PST by wagglebee
An Ohio company has embedded silicon chips in two of its employees - the first known case in which US workers have been “tagged” electronically as a way of identifying them.
CityWatcher.com, a private video surveillance company, said it was testing the technology as a way of controlling access to a room where it holds security video footage for government agencies and the police.
Embedding slivers of silicon in workers is likely to add to the controversy over RFID technology, widely seen as one of the next big growth industries.
RFID chips – inexpensive radio transmitters that give off a unique identifying signal – have been implanted in pets or attached to goods so they can be tracked in transit.
“There are very serious privacy and civil liberty issues of having people permanently numbered,” said Liz McIntyre, who campaigns against the use of identification technology.
But Sean Darks, chief executive of CityWatcher, said the glass-encased chips were like identity cards. They are planted in the upper right arm of the recipient, and “read” by a device similar to a cardreader.
“There’s nothing pulsing or sending out a signal,” said Mr Darks, who has had a chip in his own arm. “It’s not a GPS chip. My wife can’t tell where I am.”
The technology’s defenders say it is acceptable as long as it is not compulsory. But critics say any implanted device could be used to track the “wearer” without their knowledge.
VeriChip – the US company that made the devices and claims to have the only chips that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration – said the implants were designed primarily for medical purposes.
So far around 70 people in the US have had the implants, the company said.
There are cases where it makes sense -- including politicians.
It will be sold to the public as making life easier.
666
>>>Its either that, or I'd almost label some of the folks ( and its pretty easy to figure out who they are ) certifiable.
Cute. But people with sense will do a search of my posts and see your attempt to quickly dispatch anyone whose opinion PRECISELY track your own, for what it is: INTELLECTUAL LAZINESS. I have called troll for defending the Spanish electorate in 2004 (even though I live there and know a lot more about the mood of the Spanish people that pretty much ANYONE here), and now I am a troll for pointing out that chipping technology (despite nonsense about UN and NGO funding - the article is about a private firm) could aid law enforcement (as they themselves have said - just google it).
Despite your facile attempts to accept differing views, I suspect I will NOT be looking for a new username any time soon.
Nice try.
There is no way I would ever let this be done to me.
I'll settle for certifiable then.
>>>There is no way I would ever let this be done to me.
They say it really doesn't hurt.
>>I'll settle for certifiable then.
The force is too strong in this one. I give up.
...it gave me the creeps
Do random drug tests or government databases give you the creeps? If your up to no good they should, otherwise, WHO CARES? I don't have to hide behind "privacy" rights (a liberal construct) or miranda warnings because I walk the straight and narrow.
You should too.
>>>>despite nonsense about UN and NGO funding - the article is about a private firm
Responding to one of my posts without pinging me?
Are you implying that companies do not sign on to nonprofit and privately funded focus areas to promote their agendas and that they do not receive royalties in doing so?
Ok, you can stop now, we know you're a troll, you don't have to prove it anymore.
If the Amish would just OK dancing and Freeping, I'd be in.
Anyone come at me with a RFID tag and I'll blow they're head off. Not me, not in a million years will I adopt the mark of the beast.>>>>>>>>>>
How about the mark of someone who doesn't know the difference between the possessive and a contraction?
You are right.....that stuff actually doesn't bother me because I do walk the straight and narrow.....
The theological issues are not limited to "end times" stuff either.
Leviticus 19:28
"Never cut your bodies in mourning for the dead or mark your skin with tattoos, for I am the LORD."
If a simple tattoo is forbidden, then surely an implant is too.
"Are you implying that companies do not sign on to nonprofit and privately funded focus areas to promote their agendas and that they do not receive royalties in doing so?"
Nope - that's just another red-herring. The technology is either a good idea or it isn't and just because some liberal group or NGO may provide funding to one company (or five or ten), doesn't mean that OUR government can't put the technology to good use, and doesn't mean they have to give the info to the UN. Al Gore invented the internet, but looks like YOU are using it, doesn't it? I don't know what kind of car you drive, but I GUARANTEE YOU that some UN lackey drives one - you better get rid of it!!!! And maybe the UN even lobbied for the catalytic converter that sits in its exhaust path.
WHO CARES.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.