Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The unarmed guards have a clause in their contract that allows them to leave their job if they think they're in danger.

They invoked the clause Friday night for the second time in a month.

1 posted on 02/11/2006 3:25:48 AM PST by Marius3188
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Marius3188
As it stands, border guards are supposed to allow anyone suspected of being armed and dangerous into Canada and then call police.

HAAAA! Then what are you paying them for?

2 posted on 02/11/2006 3:38:17 AM PST by MNJohnnie ("Vote Democrat-We are the party of reactionary inertia".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marius3188

I'm sorry but these guys are pussies! What a disgrace!


3 posted on 02/11/2006 3:44:32 AM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marius3188

Whatever has happened to Canada?

OK, OK, I know ~ damned liberals.


4 posted on 02/11/2006 3:46:37 AM PST by Beckwith (The liberal press has picked sides ... and they have sided with the Islamofascists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marius3188

This muddleheaded pacifism of the Canucks may well turn out 2 be a security threat for the US. We oughtta take this seriously. Can't Harper do something sane to at least startreversing the madness? Any Canada observers who can point out to any good the man's done since being sworn in?


7 posted on 02/11/2006 4:02:12 AM PST by voletti (Awareness and Equanimity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marius3188

Isn't it obvious. It's part of Canaduhs French heritage.


8 posted on 02/11/2006 4:03:37 AM PST by wheelright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marius3188

"I am hoping very much for a contract like that myself."
9 posted on 02/11/2006 4:05:58 AM PST by Khurkris ("Hell, I was there"...Elmer Keith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marius3188

And how are "UNARMED" guards supposed to apprehend somebody?

Give them guns and I bet they'll be a little more courageous!


10 posted on 02/11/2006 4:06:21 AM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marius3188

Couldn't they find some French guards up there like these fellers to keep up security??
11 posted on 02/11/2006 4:06:23 AM PST by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marius3188
"We'll be back after the danger passes, eh?"


19 posted on 02/11/2006 5:38:43 AM PST by LRS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marius3188
As it stands, border guards are supposed to allow anyone suspected of being armed and dangerous into Canada and then call police.

Then who are the police supposed to call?

20 posted on 02/11/2006 5:48:40 AM PST by impatient
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
A lot of flappin' gums on this thread.

1 - I'd like to see any of you take on an armed individual without a gun

2 - Not all of Canada is French

3 - The border guards will get their side arms ... Link
26 posted on 02/11/2006 7:16:02 PM PST by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson