I address all of the many interdependent systems in complex multi-cell organisms, and you choose to reply about the "eye." How thoroughly pointless and evasive... just like all Evo-Junk-Scientists and their Kool-Aid swilling prostheletytes
I was neither pointless nor evasive. I directly addressed what you wrote most of your previous post about, the eye. The evidence for the evolution of an eye is very clear, since "reduced complexity" versions of each possible step in its evolution still exist in nature today. If you can't even be troubled to understand the "junk science" regarding something as simple as an eye evolving, why should I bother responding to the rest of the systems you asked about?