[Ol' Dan Tucker]

Well then given your above opinion, you are basically saying that anything that Charlie Daniels sings or writes(such as the article which this thread is based on) is harmless(i.e meaningless).

Well, given your silence on the lack of enforcement provisions, you are basically saying that the Kyl/Cornyn proposal isn't worth the paper on which it's written.

If defending it was a worthwhile endeavor, you would be doing so with as much vigor as you've shown for attacking a 1972 Charlie Daniels song.

[Dane]

If defending it was a worthwhile endeavor, you would be doing so with as much vigor as you've shown for attacking a 1972 Charlie Daniels song

Or your defending a Charlie Daniels article in 2006.(BTW Charlie Daniels never had to got through the scrunity of a political campaign as he collects royalities from his hollyweird stereotype anti-Southern song "Uneasy Rider").