[Dane]

If defending it was a worthwhile endeavor, you would be doing so with as much vigor as you've shown for attacking a 1972 Charlie Daniels song

Or your defending a Charlie Daniels article in 2006.(BTW Charlie Daniels never had to got through the scrunity of a political campaign as he collects royalities from his hollyweird stereotype anti-Southern song "Uneasy Rider").

[Ol' Dan Tucker]

Or your defending a Charlie Daniels article in 2006.(BTW Charlie Daniels never had to got through the scrunity of a political campaign as he collects royalities from his hollyweird stereotype anti-Southern song "Uneasy Rider").

I've not written a word in defense of Daniels.

I have written many words asking you to defend the lack of enforcement provisions in the Kyl/Cornyn immigration proposal, which you, yourself, introduced into this discussion.

You have refused to write even a single word in support of this proposal.

This leads me to one, inescapeable conclusion.

The bill is neither conservative, nor worth supporting.

If it were, you would have already done so.