Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIVE THREAD: SJC hearing on the NSA surveilance program - C-span 1; 9:30 am EST

Posted on 02/06/2006 6:08:53 AM PST by ken5050

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,741-1,7601,761-1,7801,781-1,800 ... 2,581-2,582 next last
To: Cboldt

I think the Bush Administration doesn't trust the FISA court much..


1,761 posted on 02/06/2006 12:34:55 PM PST by Txsleuth (l drink tea, not kool-aid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1746 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

Based on what you're read and what you know, do you believe the president has acted within the law?


1,762 posted on 02/06/2006 12:35:45 PM PST by Howlin (Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1760 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

They haven't been watching TV much this last week then, for sure.


1,763 posted on 02/06/2006 12:35:52 PM PST by Txsleuth (l drink tea, not kool-aid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1749 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

I think that telling a denied target is in the statute.


1,764 posted on 02/06/2006 12:35:55 PM PST by maica (We are fighting the War for the Free World. Democrats and the media are not on our side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1746 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
I heard Gonzales say that this NSA domestic to foreign calls surveillance was not claimed under the FISA law, not meant to override the FISA law.. but the President's authority claimed was by the authorization given by Congress to fight Al Queda.

The argument that I find lame is the one that aims to show thatteh surveillance in question is within the boundaries expressed in FISA, because FISA says "or other authorization," and the AUMF is that "other authorization."

1,765 posted on 02/06/2006 12:36:23 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1753 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
I think the Bush Administration doesn't trust the FISA court much..

The DemonicRats would like the Public to believe that!!!

I don't !

1,766 posted on 02/06/2006 12:36:43 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1761 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Answer me this....why hasn't Judge Robertson spoken to the press if he was so bothered by the US spying on calls.


1,767 posted on 02/06/2006 12:36:54 PM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1761 | View Replies]

To: northernlightsII
Why is your account suspended?

Because I have been very very naughty.

1,768 posted on 02/06/2006 12:37:11 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1756 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

What's the deal with Brownback and Lindsey? Obviously the war powers act passed by Congress is a valid and the strongest argument by the AG. I wish Gonzales would simply say "We can't trust many members of the Senate" and slowly remind Leahy of his leaking history. Just put it all on the table!!

Is it true that Lindsey is homosexual?


1,769 posted on 02/06/2006 12:37:20 PM PST by caffe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1759 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

Let this hearing keep going because the more they talk the more America understands that President Bush is fighting to Protect Americans and DinocRats are fighting to Protect Al Queda!

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters


1,770 posted on 02/06/2006 12:37:32 PM PST by bray (Jack Bauer '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1754 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

hehehehehehehe


1,771 posted on 02/06/2006 12:37:39 PM PST by tiredoflaundry (I'll admit it , I'm a Snow Flake !(Snoq) The rest of my tagline redacted by court order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1768 | View Replies]

To: tiredoflaundry

Feingold is up...


1,772 posted on 02/06/2006 12:38:21 PM PST by Gritty (“A court of law is not meant to be a field of battle” – Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1771 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
"I think the Bush Administration doesn't trust the FISA court much.."

I think this is the main reason we are listening to these hearings. I really think something is/was up with the FISA court and at least one of its judges. It could be why JR went to the NYT.

1,773 posted on 02/06/2006 12:38:29 PM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1761 | View Replies]

To: tiredoflaundry

Yuk! Feingold up.


1,774 posted on 02/06/2006 12:38:34 PM PST by conservativebabe ("I came here to chew bubble gum and kick @ss, and I'm all out of bubble gum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1771 | View Replies]

To: sageb1
Especially if any of the judges have treasonous friends.

That Clinton FISA judge who quit comes to mind.

1,775 posted on 02/06/2006 12:38:35 PM PST by johnny7 (“Iuventus stultorum magister”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1759 | View Replies]

To: Dog
To many people in fly over country favor us listening into comms from AQ.

Two weeks ago I would have agreed however listening to how the tide has changed with polls now showing 46% of the public is concerned, it's obvious the MSM has effectively changed minds with their constant harping. Couple that with some RINOs wringing their hands (but not before reading the new polls) and we have people now paying attention.

1,776 posted on 02/06/2006 12:39:10 PM PST by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1726 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

See....I said earlier, from Kyl's questioning...and Sessions...that perhaps this may end up with WIDER powers for Bush....as far a domestic taps if known al-queda members are talking with each other..


1,777 posted on 02/06/2006 12:39:12 PM PST by Txsleuth (l drink tea, not kool-aid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1757 | View Replies]

To: All
When is cocktail hour?



Senator Ted Kennedy (C) (D-MA) speaks with Senate Judiciary Committee ranking Democrat Pat Leahy (R) (D-VT) and committee chairman Arlen Specter (R-PA) during a hearing on Capitol Hill about domestic eavesdropping, in Washington February 6, 2006. Giving his testimony, U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales defended the Bush administration's domestic eavesdropping program as an indispensable tool to protect the country from terrorism, denying accusations the White House broke the law. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
1,778 posted on 02/06/2006 12:39:17 PM PST by maggief (and the dessert cart rolls on ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1770 | View Replies]

To: All

Feingold at it again....barf!


1,779 posted on 02/06/2006 12:39:20 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1766 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
I think the Bush Administration doesn't trust the FISA court much.

What Gonzales just said sure indicates that.

AFAIK, there are ZERO leaks attributed to a FISA court, or to any court that has had opportunity to review FISA warrants. If the courts aren't leakers, Gonzales should not suggest in public that they would be, given the opportunity.

1,780 posted on 02/06/2006 12:39:37 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1761 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,741-1,7601,761-1,7801,781-1,800 ... 2,581-2,582 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson