Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIVE THREAD: SJC hearing on the NSA surveilance program - C-span 1; 9:30 am EST

Posted on 02/06/2006 6:08:53 AM PST by ken5050

Good Monday morning, once again, fellow political jinkies. The NFL season may be over, but the political season inside the Beltway is 24/7/365. So join us, if you can, as those wacky Dems on the Senate Judiciary committee reprise their pitiful efforts to once again smear President Bush and score political points..


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; ag; albertogonzales; attorneygeneral; doj; dojprobe; gonzales; nsa; spying; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,161-1,1801,181-1,2001,201-1,220 ... 2,581-2,582 next last
To: All

PREPARED STATEMENT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL ALBERTO GONZALES TO U.S. SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
February 6, 2006

The U.S. Attorney General's prepared statement to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee at hearings inquiring about the Bush Administration's newly revealed N.S.A. domestic eavesdropping and surveillance program.

http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/nsa/gonz20606stmnt.html

Special Coverage: N.S.A. Domestic Surveillance Inquiry Documents
http://news.findlaw.com/legalnews/documents/archive_n.html#nsa


1,181 posted on 02/06/2006 10:52:35 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1150 | View Replies]

To: BeforeISleep

Rush just said the right thing -- this is exactly why the power is with one man - the president - the CIC. It can't be done by committee


1,182 posted on 02/06/2006 10:52:40 AM PST by acsrp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1176 | View Replies]

To: All

Gonzales: Your question was whether the president had authorized conduct in violation of criminal statutes. And our position is that no, it's not in violation of the criminal statutes.

Feingold: When you answered this question before, you knew about this program. You wanted people to think this kind of program wasn't going on.

Gonzales: And the president had not authorized a program in violation of the law. (So he answered honestly and Feingold is too stupid to realize it).

Feingold: You were misleading the committee.


1,183 posted on 02/06/2006 10:52:55 AM PST by Peach (Islam is an army disguised as a religion (Freeper Hoosier-Daddy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1176 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Feingold won't give it up


1,184 posted on 02/06/2006 10:53:08 AM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1179 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Did you hear him SPECULATE, that Gonzalez ASKED that he not have to be sworn in???

And when Specter said he didn't...Feingold just brushed Specter off...

All Feingold did was ask a "when did you stop beating your wife" question...to get it out there!!

What a worm...Just called him a LIAR AGAIN>


1,185 posted on 02/06/2006 10:53:11 AM PST by Txsleuth (l drink tea, not kool-aid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1171 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Feingolf just called the AG a liar.

Nice.


1,186 posted on 02/06/2006 10:53:14 AM PST by prairiebreeze (Brought to you by the American Democrat Party. aka Al Qaeda, Western Division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1179 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

He's not implying..he's trying to PROVE he lied.


1,187 posted on 02/06/2006 10:53:40 AM PST by hipaatwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1171 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Feingold saying Gonzales lied to get appointed AG. Disgusting.


1,188 posted on 02/06/2006 10:54:00 AM PST by Bahbah (An admitted Snow Flake and a member of Sam's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1185 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
It wont matter, Gonzales is ROCK SOLID. I am proud of him. He should be the next Supreme Court justice, IMHO.
1,189 posted on 02/06/2006 10:54:14 AM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1184 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Feingold: Your view of the program stood until the NYT revealed the program.

Gonzales: You asked a hypothetical about the president violating the law.

Feingold: Mr. Chairman, the witness has taken mincing words to a new high.

ALL: But the meaning of the word "is" wasn't mincing words.


1,190 posted on 02/06/2006 10:54:24 AM PST by Peach (Islam is an army disguised as a religion (Freeper Hoosier-Daddy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1186 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

OMG. Once again, Gonzalez should just get up and walk out. How dare Feingold call him a liar.


1,191 posted on 02/06/2006 10:54:24 AM PST by Not A Snowbird (Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1186 | View Replies]

To: acsrp38

Course -- dems no longer believe in the Constitution -- It is a living document that only means what we want it to mean today -- until we say it doesn't anymore


1,192 posted on 02/06/2006 10:54:30 AM PST by acsrp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1182 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

YES...Graham, DeWine and BROWNBACK...he said agreed with them that they didn't give that authorization when they gave him permission to go to war....

I can't believe that Brownback would take this position...


1,193 posted on 02/06/2006 10:54:49 AM PST by Txsleuth (l drink tea, not kool-aid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1175 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Hey Feingold .. would you like to say you didn't know about the program under oath ???


1,194 posted on 02/06/2006 10:54:49 AM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1186 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Feingold complains to specter that Gonzalez has "taken mincing words to a new high".

Feingold's pants must be incinerated at this point.


1,195 posted on 02/06/2006 10:54:50 AM PST by prairiebreeze (Brought to you by the American Democrat Party. aka Al Qaeda, Western Division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1186 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle

Feingold looks constipated... he ought'a get Fineswine to give him an enema.


1,196 posted on 02/06/2006 10:54:56 AM PST by johnny7 (“Iuventus stultorum magister”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1172 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Feingold: Admin. officials have been misleading in claims justifying the spying program. The president repeated these. He said that other presidents have used the same programs he has used. 1967 Katz case.

Gonzales: Yes, the SCOTUS found the 1967 Katz case was covered by the 4th Amendment. Presidents have relied on their constitutional authority during times of war. It doesn't mean that warrants are required in all cases.

Because of circumstances, searches without warrants are justified.


1,197 posted on 02/06/2006 10:56:07 AM PST by Peach (Islam is an army disguised as a religion (Freeper Hoosier-Daddy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1191 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Feingold was trying to roll the AG and Al ain't goin' along. When an attorney ain't getting anywhere he just moves along. Feingold is a boob.


1,198 posted on 02/06/2006 10:56:19 AM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1189 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
He should be the next Supreme Court justice, IMHO.

I know this is a bit off topic but I highly doubt Pres. Bush will pick another man for the SCOTUS. I think it will be a woman, if not a minority woman.

1,199 posted on 02/06/2006 10:56:20 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1189 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Hey, Feingold, your time is up, bitch!
1,200 posted on 02/06/2006 10:56:30 AM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1194 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,161-1,1801,181-1,2001,201-1,220 ... 2,581-2,582 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson