[GovernmentShrinker]

The need for abortion will always exist, to protect the freedom of women who don't want to give birth to a baby.

[presidio9]

The need for abortion will always exist, to protect the freedom of women who don't want to give birth to a baby.

Let me begin by saying that you're still avoiding my question as to whether you think this is a Conservative forum or a Libertarian one. Why are you afraid to answer?

That being said, your comment above is hands-down the most asinine statement that I have ever read on FR.

[Mr. Silverback]

The need for abortion will always exist, to protect the freedom of women who don't want to give birth to a baby.

Needs editing. I'll edit it for free, and even give you two versions to choose from:

The need for abortion will always exist, to protect the freedom of women to have sex with men they don't want to raise a child with.

The need for abortion will always exist, to protect the freedom of males who use women as weenie warmers.

There, all fixed. Which one do you prefer?

[wideawake]

Your true agenda stands revealed. You were bending over backwards to pretend a liar was telling the truth because you yourself are a liar and were demonstrating solidarity.

Why do you, as a left-wing radical, bother posting to this forum? There are plenty of child-murder advocacy forums on the web.

[Know your rights]

The need for abortion will always exist, to protect the freedom of women who don't want to give birth to a baby.

Women don't need abortion to avoid having a baby ... unless they've been raped, nonpenetrative sex and abstinence are always options. The "freedom" to abort is the "freedom" to commit in-utero infanticide.