Skip to comments.
FRANCE'S LE MONDE PUBLISHES FRONT-PAGE CARTOON OF MOHAMMED (Yippee!!!)
The Tocqueville Connection ^
| 2 February 2006
| AFP via The Tocqueville Connection
Posted on 02/02/2006 7:11:45 AM PST by Cornpone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 201-208 next last
To: RonF
Yup, and that's why it has wound its way into sharia, as is any criticism of the "prophet" and "allah" and why IMHO we must not "submit" to this.
81
posted on
02/02/2006 8:43:41 AM PST
by
USF
(I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade ™ © ®)
To: USF
Because they know the man and the facts surrounding him are the basis for the whole pack of lies that the house of cards called islam is based on. If mohamMAD is exposed, the entire house of cards based on his lies and will come down. Well said. And so very, very true. Excellent post!!
82
posted on
02/02/2006 8:45:34 AM PST
by
blinachka
(Vechnaya Pamyat Daddy... xoxo)
To: Cornpone
83
posted on
02/02/2006 8:45:45 AM PST
by
dagogo redux
(I never met a Dem yet who didn't understand a slap in the face, or a slug from a 45)
To: PigRigger
Kathleen Parker is a great conservative columnist and no moonbat.
84
posted on
02/02/2006 8:50:56 AM PST
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: USF
Re your #33:
"...Imposing restrictions on images of mohamMAD is enforcing elements of sharia in the west."
Exactly.
When a significant percentage of the population of any nation becomes Muhummadean, that nation is going to find itself subjected to Sharia Law, without the benefit of any democratic process or "vote".
It will NOT be an option.
One day subjects will suddenly realize that a whole new set of rules has been imposed upon them;
Violate the laws of your government, and you might get a ticket, pay a fine, or perhaps go to jail.
Violate the laws of Sharia and you'll likely get blown up, shot, or have your head sawed off... perhaps along with your entire family.
It won't take long before a PC "Diverse and tolerant" (and / or convieniently disarmed and pacified) population understands what Islam demands all of Humanity to accept:
Submit or die.
85
posted on
02/02/2006 8:51:01 AM PST
by
Uncle Jaque
(Club Freedom; Dues: Vigilance.)
To: Dark Skies
And now Jordon is getting in the game. The more the merrier! Let the world be awash in depictions of the unholy prophet to support free speech so their protests backfire on them! They have to learn their threats and intimidation will not work and if hey did not make such a big deal of this it would never have blown into something so huge in the first place.
"What brings more prejudice against Islam, these caricatures or pictures of a hostage-taker slashing the throat of his victim in front of the cameras or a suicide bomber who blows himself up during a wedding ceremony in Amman?" wrote Jihad Momani.
86
posted on
02/02/2006 8:52:09 AM PST
by
USF
(I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade ™ © ®)
To: Cornpone
I have to say this editorial strikes me as particularly hostile. Why don't these guys make some constructive criticism of Islam instead of just being so worried about their right to mock religions?
87
posted on
02/02/2006 8:54:10 AM PST
by
old and tired
(Run Swannie, run!)
To: USF
If I had to guess, I would think the islamic world will explode any moment now (or is that just wishful thinking).
I've stocked up on popcorn just in case.
88
posted on
02/02/2006 8:57:46 AM PST
by
Dark Skies
("The sleeper must awaken!")
To: AntiGuv
Re:
"Bear in mind that the owner of that newspaper is Egyptian, whereas the fired editor was French."
Didn't FOX News sort of back off on some of it's criticizm of Islam after a cetain Arab bought up a significant share of it's stock?
I wonder how many of our major media outlets are now majority owned or controlled by ME Muhhumadieans?
It will be interesting to see who buys America first;
The Chicoms, or the Arabs?
Of course, they might have to fight Mexico for us by then.
89
posted on
02/02/2006 8:59:06 AM PST
by
Uncle Jaque
(Club Freedom; Dues: Vigilance.)
To: Dark Skies
Hold on to that popcorn until we get the mass flushings of korans underway! ;oP
90
posted on
02/02/2006 9:01:48 AM PST
by
USF
(I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade ™ © ®)
To: SJackson
This is a case of Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi., that is 'what is permissible to Jove is not permissible to cattle. Apparently, the Islamicists see themselves as the Kings of the Universe, and the rest of us as mere cattle.
To: Uncle Jaque
I've seen that alleged, though I haven't seen concrete evidence.
Other's have posted above that the Egyptian owner is a Coptic Christian, which I didn't know when I posted, so that definitely changes my perception of things some!
92
posted on
02/02/2006 9:06:25 AM PST
by
AntiGuv
To: Cornpone
Comment #94 Removed by Moderator
To: sageb1
Kathleen Parker is a great conservative columnist and no moonbat....
Than I retract my original comment....To bad, I was hoping another DUmmie saw the light.....
95
posted on
02/02/2006 9:08:07 AM PST
by
PigRigger
(Send donations to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org)
To: USF
That is a great cartoon. Thanks to CoxAndForkum and thanks to you for posting it.
96
posted on
02/02/2006 9:09:43 AM PST
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: Cornpone
"A Muslim may well be shocked by a picture of Mohammed, especially an ill-intentioned one. But a democracy cannot start policing people's opinions, except by trampling the rights of man underfoot," it said.
Unless, of course, your opinion is that sodomy is disgusting and that homosexuality is a perversion. In that case, you have no rights, right Frenchie?
97
posted on
02/02/2006 9:10:41 AM PST
by
Antoninus
(The only reason you're alive today is because your parents were pro-life.)
To: HonduGOP
>>those groups most vocal in demanding tolerance from others are usually themselves the least tolerant." <<
Someone please point this out to the NYT.
To: Cornpone
99
posted on
02/02/2006 9:13:45 AM PST
by
veronica
To: USF
That's fine. I just don't want people to think that this is all about these particular cartoons and their particular content. Any depiction of Mohammed, even in a completely reverent context, has always been forbidden by Islam.
100
posted on
02/02/2006 9:16:22 AM PST
by
RonF
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 201-208 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson