Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TomAdkinsCC
Death of The Roman Empire
8 posted on 01/31/2006 11:48:35 PM PST by KDD (A wink is as good as a nod to a blind horse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KDD

What a great read, thanks!


12 posted on 02/01/2006 12:27:39 AM PST by ThirstyMan (hysteria: the elixir of the Left that trumps all reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: KDD

Bush is Trajan.
The next president will be Hadrian.


14 posted on 02/01/2006 12:41:47 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: KDD

That is an interesting article, but to lay the demise of the Empire solely on taxation requires a certain tunnel vision. The Eastern Empire survived the West for another thousand years, with essentially the same system of taxation. One reads of similar abuses by the tax merchants there hundreds of years after the fall of Rome. Why didn't Constantinople break down at the same time? I don't know the answer, but I don't think the authors of this article do, either. The productivity of the Western Empire suffered a cataclysmic breakdown at some point, but I doubt it was solely the responsibility of taxation. Predatory tribal migrations that could not be stopped no matter how strong the Roman defenses were developed - and they became very sophisticated - is a more likely answer.


21 posted on 02/01/2006 4:02:45 PM PST by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson