1 posted on
01/29/2006 6:17:43 PM PST by
demlosers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: demlosers
Let me be the first to ask?
"... resurrect the "hate side of the political agenda".
Just where do they think it has been buried? There is enough hate from the left wingers to spawn a celebrity out of a washed up hippie, Cindy Sheehan.
31 posted on
01/29/2006 6:47:27 PM PST by
billhilly
(The Democrat symbol is no longer the donkey, it's a strait Jacket.)
To: demlosers
the dems will go with hillary because they are stupid and unimaginative... they are desperate to win and will go back to the old democrat playbook and try to run hillary on bill's record (!) ... they will lose miserably
36 posted on
01/29/2006 6:52:24 PM PST by
InvisibleChurch
(The search for someone to blame is always successful. - Robert Half)
To: demlosers
getting pelted by the Republicans with rotten tomatoes Nah, we'd use something with a little more pazazz, like rotten watermellons.
Really, when you think about it, it says a lot about her that even with a sickeningly sycophantic press she can't get better poll numbers. How McCurry and Panetta keep straight faces when they peddle this drivel is beyond me. New lows for amorality, even for politicos.
"She clearly understands there is a real need to re-establish some sense of bipartisan co-operation".
How does anyone write that down without LOL? I'd be too embarrassed. Of course I actually care about my country.
40 posted on
01/29/2006 7:06:02 PM PST by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there.)
To: demlosers
Hillary is no dummy. She knows she can't win in '08 in a two person race. Her max is about 45 percent. Bill could manager 49 percent in a good year, with no war and a great (Reagan-created) economy. Just like her husband did twice, she will have to rely on a third party candidate to siphon off 6 percent or so of the GOP vote. It will either be McCain storming off the stage after he is rejected by GOP voters in the primary, or some other RINO, seduced by the siren call of the media to run because the GOP is just too conservative. See that happen, and beware. If it doesn't, rejoice in the knowledge that Hillary will go down in flames, winning far fewer states than Kerry did.
43 posted on
01/29/2006 7:15:12 PM PST by
Defiant
(Dar al Salaam will exist when the entire world submits to American leadership.)
To: demlosers
Hahahaha... Seems HRC didn't count on being held accountable for her triangulatory attempts on major issues within her own pathetic party. Hillary's been such a snappy fingered b*tch for so long that she may as well be a duck out of water when it comes to having to answer any hard questions.
And to think the smartest woman in the world thought the presidency was hers for the taking! Bwahahahaha....
44 posted on
01/29/2006 7:17:48 PM PST by
demkicker
(democrats and terrorists are familiar bedfellows)
To: demlosers
If Hitlary thought voting by her "constituents" really mattered, she would have outlawed elections.
Democrats have no choice. This battle will be done on the leadership level. Right now Hitlary controls the democrat party not Dean.
To: demlosers
In the Senate, Ms Clinton has forged political alliances on such issues as the environment and healthcare with Senator John McCain, a 2008 Republican contender. According to Mr McCurry, she is enjoying the role of consensus-maker. Har!! I suppose it's no surprise that in Australia they don't know what John McCain is.
To: demlosers
The Mayor of Yonkers is going to drive Hillary nuts and this election is going to be fun to watch. She may win, but it won't be a cakewalk.
He seems to be a Republican of courage, a rare breed indeed in the Empire State!
51 posted on
01/29/2006 7:32:05 PM PST by
Gritty
(“Palestinians are so depraved they're electing candidates on the basis of child sacrifice-Mark Steyn)
To: demlosers
Those missing 120 pages of the Barrett Report are hanging over head like an anvil.
To: demlosers
Leon Panetta, Mr Clinton's former chief of staff, said there was "nervousness" among Democrats about backing such a controversial figure at a time when many Americans believe President George W.Bush has polarised the country Better get a more "reasonable" ticket that can win!
Kennedy / Byrd 2008 - The Soused and Senile Ticket!!
55 posted on
01/29/2006 7:53:41 PM PST by
Bommer
(Ted Kennedy - Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life!)
To: demlosers
I disagree with this leftist article re the emergence of possibles for the Rep. position of candidate for the Presidency. To prove the nation's awareness of two of these figures, one need only use a single name for each:
Condi
Newt
Either would result in Broomhilda being roadkill - a fitting fate for the witch spelled with a capital B.
59 posted on
01/29/2006 8:46:58 PM PST by
Rembrandt
(We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
To: demlosers
73 posted on
01/30/2006 2:30:49 AM PST by
SR 50
(Larry)
To: demlosers

You stand no chance against the power of the dark side"
74 posted on
01/30/2006 2:54:42 AM PST by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: demlosers
If things are looking bad for the triangulating Reptile this far out, it can't be good.
I fully expect Hilly to go into a full blown narcissistic meltdown.
To: demlosers
Ms Clinton's modest success with voters in small-town upstate New York is taken by some as proof she can win over conservatives Yeah, right. Maybe the fake "conservatives" who pop up every now and then to screech that we have to support the RINO du jour, but that's about it.
85 posted on
01/30/2006 4:20:58 PM PST by
Prime Choice
(We are RepubliCANs, not RepubliCAN'Ts.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson