Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Senator) Feingold's (D, WI) Vote on Alito Significant
Madison.com ^ | January 26, 2006 | John Nichols

Posted on 01/27/2006 6:33:45 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Pure political positioning and posturing on Feingold's part. Of course, no one on the left is going to come out and actually SAY that. Feingold always votes in opposition when it's obvious the cause is lost. That way he wins points from the far looney left for "standing up" for what the insane in his party believe.
1 posted on 01/27/2006 6:33:46 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Watery Tart; KRAUTMAN; reformedliberal; Mygirlsmom; codercpc; s2baccha; ozaukeemom; PjhCPA; ...

"Friday Feingold" Ping! :)


2 posted on 01/27/2006 6:34:23 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
"Senate's most adventurous thinker and independent player" I can't even think of a good comment on that statement.
3 posted on 01/27/2006 6:39:54 AM PST by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
" if Alito is unacceptable to Feingold, then he should be unacceptable to a good many other senators including moderate Republicans....."

How about the flip side:

If Alito is acceptable to Sheets, then he should be acceptable to EVERY other Senator!
4 posted on 01/27/2006 6:40:26 AM PST by TRY ONE (NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Wow! John Nichols has that boot licking thing (with the happy ending I might add) down pat. Someone get Feingold a smoke!


5 posted on 01/27/2006 6:40:42 AM PST by Niteranger68 ("Only 4 out of 3 Democrats actually vote.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
Isn't Senator Finepoll running for president.

For him to vote for a good man like Alito would return a death vote from his loony fringe Wisconsin voters and for his future career.

The loony liberal Senators are finally showing their true colors.

Senator Rusty Finepoll is a like a big black cat with a white stripe.

You don't call it a skunk until it stinks up the place.
6 posted on 01/27/2006 6:43:28 AM PST by OKIEDOC (There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Russ

Senator Feingold has voted for all of TWO nominees who were put up by a republican president, those being Roberts and Alito. He is a disgrace to my state and one of the most liberal senators in the senate. This article is a typical product of a pot smoking madison liberal, viewing the world through his smoke filled bong.


7 posted on 01/27/2006 6:43:41 AM PST by milwguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

"is the fact that U.S. Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., has voted for the first time in his Senate career against a Supreme Court nominee."

Demonstrating that he wants to be on the ticket in '08.


8 posted on 01/27/2006 6:45:38 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
"...arguably..."
When you find this word in a news story, it usually means it was written by the subject's fan club.
9 posted on 01/27/2006 6:47:48 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
Feingold's standard has often infuriated liberal interest groups, along with many of his fellow Democrats, who have argued that he has given too much slack to right-wing Republicans who will never repay the favor.

Three words: Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

10 posted on 01/27/2006 6:48:05 AM PST by tellw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Feingold's a d*ck. Why should we care??


11 posted on 01/27/2006 6:48:31 AM PST by RockinRight (Attention RNC...we're the party of Reagan, not FDR...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Feingold himself is insignificant. Therefore, any action he takes is also insignificant.


12 posted on 01/27/2006 6:51:55 AM PST by TheBigB (Moooooomm! I'll pick up my clothes later! I'm busy raging aginst the machine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
safeguard the rights and freedoms of Americans

The ones we won't have if we are D-E-A-D from TERRORISTS ATTACKS! What a foolish politician who cares nothing about anyone's "rights and freedoms" only his next campaign.

13 posted on 01/27/2006 6:53:18 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
safeguard the rights and freedoms of Americans

Is this the same oaf that co-sponsored the McCain-Feingold bill? You know, the one that directly suppresses free speech!

14 posted on 01/27/2006 7:13:03 AM PST by Bob Buchholz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: milwguy

LOL - you're right. Feingold was first elected to the Senate in 1992. Roberts is the only Republican Supreme Court nominee he's ever voted to confirm.


15 posted on 01/27/2006 7:13:38 AM PST by Fatalist (60 in 06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Bah..this article is nonsense.

Fiengolds vote is meaningless.

We already have the votes to confirm the only question is whether they can filibuster and the three conservatives who MIGHT be inclined to vote no would almost certainly still vote for cloture.

Add the four confirmed dem yea's on Alito and all we are missing is one vote. Diane Fienstein has stated on the record that she would not support a filibuster even though she will vote no. That is all the votes we need assuming Fienstein doesnt change her mind.


16 posted on 01/27/2006 7:14:37 AM PST by Prysson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Buchholz
Is this the same oaf that co-sponsored the McCain-Feingold bill? You know, the one that directly suppresses free speech!

That would be the one. Hypocrites are amazingly stupid.

17 posted on 01/27/2006 7:16:08 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Fatalist

If Fiengold was elected in 92 then he voted for Ginsberg who was confirmed in 93

The point is still taken though


18 posted on 01/27/2006 7:17:16 AM PST by Prysson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
... he has distinguished embarrassed himself

Just correcting what must have been a typo.

19 posted on 01/27/2006 7:18:16 AM PST by catpuppy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Russ

How about a simple translation: "Wackier than a 7-dollar bill!" ;-P


20 posted on 01/27/2006 7:19:23 AM PST by MortMan (There is no substitute for victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson