Skip to comments.
(Senator) Feingold's (D, WI) Vote on Alito Significant
Madison.com ^
| January 26, 2006
| John Nichols
Posted on 01/27/2006 6:33:45 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Pure political positioning and posturing on Feingold's part. Of course, no one on the left is going to come out and actually SAY that. Feingold always votes in opposition when it's obvious the cause is lost. That way he wins points from the far looney left for "standing up" for what the insane in his party believe.
To: Watery Tart; KRAUTMAN; reformedliberal; Mygirlsmom; codercpc; s2baccha; ozaukeemom; PjhCPA; ...
"Friday Feingold" Ping! :)
2
posted on
01/27/2006 6:34:23 AM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
"Senate's most adventurous thinker and independent player" I can't even think of a good comment on that statement.
3
posted on
01/27/2006 6:39:54 AM PST
by
Russ
To: Diana in Wisconsin
" if Alito is unacceptable to Feingold, then he should be unacceptable to a good many other senators including moderate Republicans....."
How about the flip side:
If Alito is acceptable to Sheets, then he should be acceptable to EVERY other Senator!
4
posted on
01/27/2006 6:40:26 AM PST
by
TRY ONE
(NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Wow! John Nichols has that boot licking thing (with the happy ending I might add) down pat. Someone get Feingold a smoke!
5
posted on
01/27/2006 6:40:42 AM PST
by
Niteranger68
("Only 4 out of 3 Democrats actually vote.")
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Isn't Senator Finepoll running for president.
For him to vote for a good man like Alito would return a death vote from his loony fringe Wisconsin voters and for his future career.
The loony liberal Senators are finally showing their true colors.
Senator Rusty Finepoll is a like a big black cat with a white stripe.
You don't call it a skunk until it stinks up the place.
6
posted on
01/27/2006 6:43:28 AM PST
by
OKIEDOC
(There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
To: Russ
Senator Feingold has voted for all of TWO nominees who were put up by a republican president, those being Roberts and Alito. He is a disgrace to my state and one of the most liberal senators in the senate. This article is a typical product of a pot smoking madison liberal, viewing the world through his smoke filled bong.
7
posted on
01/27/2006 6:43:41 AM PST
by
milwguy
To: Diana in Wisconsin
"is the fact that U.S. Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., has voted for the first time in his Senate career against a Supreme Court nominee."
Demonstrating that he wants to be on the ticket in '08.
To: Diana in Wisconsin
"...arguably..."
When you find this word in a news story, it usually means it was written by the subject's fan club.
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Feingold's standard has often infuriated liberal interest groups, along with many of his fellow Democrats, who have argued that he has given too much slack to right-wing Republicans who will never repay the favor. Three words: Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
10
posted on
01/27/2006 6:48:05 AM PST
by
tellw
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Feingold's a d*ck. Why should we care??
11
posted on
01/27/2006 6:48:31 AM PST
by
RockinRight
(Attention RNC...we're the party of Reagan, not FDR...)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Feingold himself is insignificant. Therefore, any action he takes is also insignificant.
12
posted on
01/27/2006 6:51:55 AM PST
by
TheBigB
(Moooooomm! I'll pick up my clothes later! I'm busy raging aginst the machine!)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
safeguard the rights and freedoms of Americans The ones we won't have if we are D-E-A-D from TERRORISTS ATTACKS! What a foolish politician who cares nothing about anyone's "rights and freedoms" only his next campaign.
13
posted on
01/27/2006 6:53:18 AM PST
by
kcvl
To: kcvl
safeguard the rights and freedoms of Americans Is this the same oaf that co-sponsored the McCain-Feingold bill? You know, the one that directly suppresses free speech!
To: milwguy
LOL - you're right. Feingold was first elected to the Senate in 1992. Roberts is the only Republican Supreme Court nominee he's ever voted to confirm.
15
posted on
01/27/2006 7:13:38 AM PST
by
Fatalist
(60 in 06)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Bah..this article is nonsense.
Fiengolds vote is meaningless.
We already have the votes to confirm the only question is whether they can filibuster and the three conservatives who MIGHT be inclined to vote no would almost certainly still vote for cloture.
Add the four confirmed dem yea's on Alito and all we are missing is one vote. Diane Fienstein has stated on the record that she would not support a filibuster even though she will vote no. That is all the votes we need assuming Fienstein doesnt change her mind.
16
posted on
01/27/2006 7:14:37 AM PST
by
Prysson
To: Bob Buchholz
Is this the same oaf that co-sponsored the McCain-Feingold bill? You know, the one that directly suppresses free speech! That would be the one. Hypocrites are amazingly stupid.
17
posted on
01/27/2006 7:16:08 AM PST
by
kcvl
To: Fatalist
If Fiengold was elected in 92 then he voted for Ginsberg who was confirmed in 93
The point is still taken though
18
posted on
01/27/2006 7:17:16 AM PST
by
Prysson
To: Diana in Wisconsin
... he has
distinguished embarrassed himself
Just correcting what must have been a typo.
19
posted on
01/27/2006 7:18:16 AM PST
by
catpuppy
To: Russ
How about a simple translation: "Wackier than a 7-dollar bill!" ;-P
20
posted on
01/27/2006 7:19:23 AM PST
by
MortMan
(There is no substitute for victory.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson