To: All
Show us the partial differential equations.
Somce conservative barking moonbat decided to do nothing more than offer a cowardly cop-out, can anyone else make sense of this demand? Is a theory not "science" unless people who accept the theory as valid can show "partial differential equations" (with no qualifiers as to what they should apply specifically) on demand?
141 posted on
01/26/2006 10:05:41 AM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
"Is a theory not "science" unless people who accept the theory as valid can show "partial differential equations" "
Not only that, you STILL haven't stated the quantum field strength of relative fitness levels!! Pathetic!!
:)
144 posted on
01/26/2006 10:08:51 AM PST by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
To: Dimensio; conservative barking moonbat
//A thing is a science if enough scientists say it is.//
Yes, that is what one of your evo 'scientist' has said.
145 posted on
01/26/2006 10:16:21 AM PST by
RunningWolf
(Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
To: Dimensio; conservative barking moonbat
Somce conservative barking moonbat decided to do nothing more than offer a cowardly cop-out, can anyone else make sense of this demand? Yes, it means that "conservative barking moonbat" has a grossly distorted impression of what is required for a valid field of science, probably due to ignorance, and he is obnoxiously belligerent enough to insult you for not being as mistaken on the topic as he is.
Is a theory not "science" unless people who accept the theory as valid can show "partial differential equations" (with no qualifiers as to what they should apply specifically) on demand?
Of course not. That's just "conservative barking moonbat"'s childish misunderstanding.
To: Dimensio
It's his equivalent of "Where's the beef". Totally meaningless, but humorous to him in a twisted sort of way.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson