Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry
"I simply do not find the results significant and/or believable," comments physicist Dan Shapira of Oak Ridge (Tenn.) National Laboratory.

So much for the claim that science is uniformly, dispassionately based on fact, as oppposed to the "emotion-based" claims of religion. ;-)

Look for this quote on a crevo thread soon?

Full Disclosure: Can you say "polywater" ? Cheers!

12 posted on 01/25/2006 5:18:41 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers

Science is based on fact. Scepticism is very much a part of scientific inquiry and what this scientist is expressing is scepticism these results are accurate. Along with the calls by others in the article demanding the results be reproduced in other labs the scientific process is working perfectly here.


14 posted on 01/25/2006 5:28:34 AM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson