[RunningWolf]

You declare him a liar on your three points. And 66% of those based on opinion, and the other 33% a distinction??

Sigh.. What shall I say about your grading, your judgment Retro? Well I shall say nothing because I choose not too.

TheBrotherhood is still there, despite your dismissal.

Regards,

Wolf

[hail to the chief]

Those three points do not place the burden of proof on VadeRetro. It is the responsibilty of TheBrotherhood to make accurate statements, especially when claiming to be supported by "historical fact," and to admit it when he is caught bald-faced lying.

[VadeRetro]

You declare him a liar on your three points. And 66% of those based on opinion, and the other 33% a distinction??

You and Bro-hood are claiming "historical fact." 66% of your evidence is one man's opinion (that only the first basic step of the story, a meeting, happened). 33% of your evidence is ignoring the difference between what Moore believes can be shown and "Darwin recanted his theory."

A historical fact is a thing for which you have abundant positive evidence.