[VadeRetro]

You cited a quote that a scholar named Moore concluded a visit occurred as the evidence that makes "Darwin recanted on his deathbed" a historical fact. You selectively and with absolutely jeering dishonesty omitted:

1. ... that the visit having happened is but one man's opinion,
2. ... that the overwhelming preponderance of opinion (and the opinion of the AiG article) is that Darwin did not recant,
3. ... that the very same article notes a distinction between the claims of Lady Hope's story and Darwin actually recanting his theory.

You, Sir, are not only a liar but a painfully obvious liar. A particularly bad dancer of the Dummy Dance of Creationism. F- and dismissed.

[RunningWolf]

You declare him a liar on your three points. And 66% of those based on opinion, and the other 33% a distinction??

Sigh.. What shall I say about your grading, your judgment Retro? Well I shall say nothing because I choose not too.

TheBrotherhood is still there, despite your dismissal.

Regards,

Wolf

[TheBrotherhood]

LOL!

Typical coward behavior. They got F this and F that before they run away with their tail between their legs.

You're dismissed too, pal.