[TheBrotherhood]

>So the best evidence that you can offer for your claim that it is a "historical fact" that Darwin recanted on his deathbed is an article that concludes that it cannot be known.

As I understood it, the article leans more towards a recant by Darwin than an unknown.

Have you all read my other links that proves that there was, in fact, a recant?

I think one has to be fair and not post slanted articles which agree with his/her view, so I decided to post an additional link which at first, and especially if not read in its entirety, may seem neutral, but in reality leans slightly towards a recant by Darwin.

Again, read it with an open mind and you'll agree that Lady Hope was real and so were her assertions regarding Darwins disavowal of his pet theory.

They say a mind is like a parachute: it works best when open.

[Dimensio]

As I understood it, the article leans more towards a recant by Darwin than an unknown.

Then you didn't read it, because it concludes with " we cannot come to a firm conclusion either way." But then, you're lying, so it's not surprising that you're misrepresenting the article that doesn't support your original claim (that Darwin's own children testified that he recanted).

Have you all read my other links that proves that there was, in fact, a recant?

You are again lying. You have provided no other links. You have made comments regarding a link to a creationist website that also disputes the recanting claim, and you quoted snippets out of context and lied about the conclusions, and you called the articles on creationist websites "pro evolution stories", because you are a liar.

[VadeRetro]

As I understood it, the article leans more towards a recant by Darwin than an unknown.

So you can't find a shred of positive evidence anywhere for what you called a "historical fact." By now, you have to realize everyone reading this thread can see this.

Why can't you just say, "I was wrong about Darwin's deathbed recantation being a historical fact?" The only question left is that of what is the matter with you that you can't admit to what everyone but everyone can see.