[Dimensio]

As I understood it, the article leans more towards a recant by Darwin than an unknown.

Then you didn't read it, because it concludes with " we cannot come to a firm conclusion either way." But then, you're lying, so it's not surprising that you're misrepresenting the article that doesn't support your original claim (that Darwin's own children testified that he recanted).

Have you all read my other links that proves that there was, in fact, a recant?

You are again lying. You have provided no other links. You have made comments regarding a link to a creationist website that also disputes the recanting claim, and you quoted snippets out of context and lied about the conclusions, and you called the articles on creationist websites "pro evolution stories", because you are a liar.

[TheBrotherhood]

>You have provided no other links.

My other links are dispersed between this thread and other crevo threads and most of the authoritative articles they lead to lean toward a recant.