Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheBrotherhood; Dimensio
Actually, it said,


"Moore concludes that Lady Hope probably did visit Charles between Wednesday, 28 September and Sunday, 2 October 1881, almost certainly when Francis and Henrietta were absent, but his wife, Emma, probably was present."

Why did you cut out the part of the sentence that makes her arrival probable but not certain? And why do you ignore the conclusions of the creationists website that says the story is bogus?
452 posted on 01/24/2006 2:41:04 PM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies ]


To: CarolinaGuitarman; TheBrotherhood; Dimensio

And it concludes with:

It therefore appears that Darwin did not recant, and it is a pity that to this day the Lady Hope story occasionally appears in tracts published and given out by well-meaning people.


455 posted on 01/24/2006 2:46:54 PM PST by Condorman (Prefer infinitely the company of those seeking the truth to those who believe they have found it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson