To: CarolinaGuitarman; TheBrotherhood; Dimensio
And it concludes with:
It therefore appears that Darwin did not recant, and it is a pity that to this day the Lady Hope story occasionally appears in tracts published and given out by well-meaning people.
455 posted on
01/24/2006 2:46:54 PM PST by
Condorman
(Prefer infinitely the company of those seeking the truth to those who believe they have found it.)
To: Condorman; TheBrotherhood
Remember, TheBrotherhood ORIGINALLY claimed that "Darwin, according to his daughter/son, repented and asked forgiveness foe his frauds perpetrated on humanity."
Not only has he quoted an AiG article out of context and lied about its conclusion, but he hasn't even tried to support his initial lie that Darwin's "daughter/son" reported that Darwin had recanted.
462 posted on
01/24/2006 3:56:30 PM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Condorman; CarolinaGuitarman
I used to wonder ... who in this world could possibly be more dishonest than the dirtbag charlatans who run creationist websites? Now I know.
472 posted on
01/24/2006 4:20:43 PM PST by
PatrickHenry
(Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson