Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dimensio
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v18/i1/darwin_recant.asp

Lady Hope "did visit Charles between Wednesday, 28 September and Sunday, 2 October 1881, almost certainly when Francis and Henrietta were absent, but his wife, Emma, probably was present."

451 posted on 01/24/2006 2:29:09 PM PST by TheBrotherhood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies ]


To: TheBrotherhood; Dimensio
Actually, it said,


"Moore concludes that Lady Hope probably did visit Charles between Wednesday, 28 September and Sunday, 2 October 1881, almost certainly when Francis and Henrietta were absent, but his wife, Emma, probably was present."

Why did you cut out the part of the sentence that makes her arrival probable but not certain? And why do you ignore the conclusions of the creationists website that says the story is bogus?
452 posted on 01/24/2006 2:41:04 PM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies ]

To: TheBrotherhood; Dimensio
Why didn't you post this from Answersingenesis? :

"It therefore appears that Darwin did not recant, and it is a pity that to this day the Lady Hope story occasionally appears in tracts published and given out by well-meaning people."

http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v18/i1/darwin_recant.asp
454 posted on 01/24/2006 2:44:54 PM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies ]

To: TheBrotherhood

I'm now fully convinced you are not for real. You screwed around all day as if "researching" your bogus claim as if typing "Darwin deathbed" in Google was a difficult and time consuming task - even while you were online.

Then, you actually made the effort to take out words from you quote from AiG, THEN, you boldly posted it here like we all haven't seen that a million times... ok, i'll stop.

You're totally a fraud. You are a plant and a hack. No way you are real.


459 posted on 01/24/2006 3:43:20 PM PST by whattajoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies ]

To: TheBrotherhood
Funny how you deliberately ingored the article's conclusion:

"It therefore appears that Darwin did not recant, and it is a pity that to this day the Lady Hope story occasionally appears in tracts published and given out by well-meaning people."
460 posted on 01/24/2006 3:51:18 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies ]

To: TheBrotherhood

What you fail to mention, in your post #451, is that even if Lady Hope did see Darwin, it was a full 6 months before he died, and at that time, he was not on his deathbed, as Lady Hope claims....therefore, Lady Hope lied...she might have been there, might, being the important word(it cannot be said with any absolute certainty whether she was there or not, 6 months before Darwins death)...but she was not there when Darwin was on his deathbed...

But if Emma, Darwins wife was also there, why does she not support Lady Hopes claims...the answer is obvious...


467 posted on 01/24/2006 4:09:18 PM PST by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson