Skip to comments.
Evolution study tightens human-chimp connection
EurekAlert (AAAS) ^
| 23 January 2006
| Staff
Posted on 01/23/2006 4:31:58 PM PST by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460, 461-480, 481-500 ... 761-777 next last
To: whattajoke; TheBrotherhood
You're totally a fraud. You are a plant and a hack. No way you are real.
Why would TheBrotherhood being a fraud and a hack indicate that he's not a real creationist? It's not like we've not seen plenty of other creationist frauds and hacks.
So he's vehemently defending a lie, going so far as to selectively quote out of context an article whose conclusion is completely the opposite of his claim. Creationists do that all the time.
461
posted on
01/24/2006 3:53:26 PM PST
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Condorman; TheBrotherhood
Remember, TheBrotherhood ORIGINALLY claimed that "Darwin, according to his daughter/son, repented and asked forgiveness foe his frauds perpetrated on humanity."
Not only has he quoted an AiG article out of context and lied about its conclusion, but he hasn't even tried to support his initial lie that Darwin's "daughter/son" reported that Darwin had recanted.
462
posted on
01/24/2006 3:56:30 PM PST
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Condorman
And previously as Dallas Man and previous to that as New York Man.
463
posted on
01/24/2006 3:58:14 PM PST
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Dimensio; TheBrotherhood
Nah, he's different. I mean, he went out of his way to manipulate the quote from AiG. He made an effort. As we know, real creationists avoid all effort and work. Btw, it's been a while since anyone pointed out to TheBro that the Darwin deathbed story, while patently false, has no bearing on modern day science even if it weren't made up.
To: VadeRetro; warpcorebreach
With your consent up front, I'll email Dolphin and if you're who you claim you can email me back and say, "Yes, I'm 'warpcorebreach' on FreeRepublic." How does that sound? It sounds to me as if you should just go ahead and do it, with or without warpcorebreach's "consent".
To: Condorman
Note the primitive head covering, as compared to what we now call Pittsburgh Man. LOL! Good one. You have me convinced ;-)
466
posted on
01/24/2006 4:07:38 PM PST
by
BMCDA
(cdesign proponentsists - the missing link)
To: TheBrotherhood
What you fail to mention, in your post #451, is that even if Lady Hope did see Darwin, it was a full 6 months before he died, and at that time, he was not on his deathbed, as Lady Hope claims....therefore, Lady Hope lied...she might have been there, might, being the important word(it cannot be said with any absolute certainty whether she was there or not, 6 months before Darwins death)...but she was not there when Darwin was on his deathbed...
But if Emma, Darwins wife was also there, why does she not support Lady Hopes claims...the answer is obvious...
To: whattajoke
I mean, he went out of his way to manipulate the quote from AiG. He made an effort.
Possibly. But then, I've seen cases where creationists saw a block of words strung together and didn't think any further before copying and pasting, honestly thinking that they were making a point whilst missing that the full context completely contradicted their claim.
468
posted on
01/24/2006 4:10:11 PM PST
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
Funny how you deliberately ingored the article's conclusion: [...] Hmmm, this reeks of nmh-syndrome...
469
posted on
01/24/2006 4:13:19 PM PST
by
BMCDA
(cdesign proponentsists - the missing link)
To: BMCDA
I agree with your post #469..tho there are other posters, who come to my mind, whose name one can use for that syndrome...
To: warpcorebreach
I see no mention of Irish or Scots there.
471
posted on
01/24/2006 4:16:44 PM PST
by
Oztrich Boy
(Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering)
To: Condorman; CarolinaGuitarman
I used to wonder ... who in this world could possibly be more dishonest than the dirtbag charlatans who run creationist websites? Now I know.
472
posted on
01/24/2006 4:20:43 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
To: TheBrotherhood
You call that name-calling? That poster is Mother Theresa.
473
posted on
01/24/2006 4:27:21 PM PST
by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: Condorman
![](http://www.steelergridiron.com/photogallery/images/jack_lambert4_jpg.jpg)
We have historical evidence of what must be considered the quinitissential Pittsburgh Man. If this ain't proof of evolution, I don't know what is.
Also arguably the best MLB of all time.
474
posted on
01/24/2006 4:37:57 PM PST
by
freedumb2003
(American troops cannot be defeated. American Politicians can.)
To: TheBrotherhood
I misread your post, having been away from the thread for 4-5 hours. You were talking about my 390. Note that the poster to whose characterization you object had sneeringly repeated a point I had refuted at some length. Playing dumb will lead to a spade being noted as a spade.
475
posted on
01/24/2006 4:46:39 PM PST
by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: BMCDA
I mean has anyone ever witnessed a Baltimore Man turn into an Indianapolis Man? As a former Baltimore Colt fan, let me just say ... don't get me started.
476
posted on
01/24/2006 4:51:00 PM PST
by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: Virginia-American
How do you account for the data in post 56?
I didn't post #56, why should I account for it?
477
posted on
01/24/2006 4:51:13 PM PST
by
StACase
To: Junior
I've been nothing but civil to you to this point?
I've learned that being civil to you people doesn't pay. President Bush would do well to learn the same lesson.
478
posted on
01/24/2006 4:52:51 PM PST
by
StACase
To: VadeRetro
I clicked on the wrong reply link,Sorry. One of you liberals claimed we are most closely related to bonobos.
479
posted on
01/24/2006 4:58:24 PM PST
by
StACase
To: VadeRetro
As a former Baltimore Colt fan, let me just say ... don't get me started. ROFL! I see, you evolved ;)
480
posted on
01/24/2006 5:00:27 PM PST
by
BMCDA
(cdesign proponentsists - the missing link)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460, 461-480, 481-500 ... 761-777 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson