Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hunble

It is supported by physical facts. In fact, it is the only explanation which fits all the physical facts. The other models have to *assume* that Mars once supported a much denser atmosphere in order to have had liquid water flowing on the surface, even though there is no evidence for it, and no explanation for how it could have been that way, or what happened to change the conditions.


25 posted on 01/22/2006 9:16:55 PM PST by SunkenCiv (In the long run, there is only the short run.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv
In fact, it is the only explanation which fits all the physical facts.

While I may agree with you on this theory, it is just that. Only a theory.

Until we can perform actual experiments on the surface of Mars, it will be impossible to know the difference between computer models and reality.

The current "Global Warming" crap has taught me to experiment with the actual physical environment and learn about factual reality. Sadly, today's computer models have become as abstract as Aristotle's thought experiments.

27 posted on 01/22/2006 9:31:12 PM PST by Hunble (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson