Good point. All we have to do is look for areas with children forming a ring around it.
This makes me wonder if their bunkers are really strong enough to withstand our bunker buster bombs. They're obviously worried about it. Someone needs to assassinate that crazy president of Iran.
I'm thinkin' their bunkers were built before our bunker busters were created...
Finally someone I agree totally with, not only the president but the whole bunch of mad mullahs, sooner or later we will have to face this bunch of loonies.
That's what people kept saying before Iraq too. Getting close to one of these dictators is next to impossible. Even if we got rid of Mahmoud, we'd still have Supreme Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to deal with. If he didn't support this it wouldn't be happening, as he and his cabal probably are the only people that could get the wet work done.
Why do that? He's our ticket to "fix" the situation in Iran
Remember, we've shared our nuclear bunker-buster technology with Israel. That would let us keep our hands relatively clean while still seeing our ends met.
They're obviously worried about it. Someone needs to assassinate that crazy president of Iran.
Do you remember the ending to Tom Clancy's The Sum of All Fears (the book, not the movie)?
"Good point. All we have to do is look for areas with children forming a ring around it."
Actually, this was spontaneous. The kids have wisened up and want to be taken away by helo. The human chain spells "HELP. LOONY IN CONTROL"
They know how we think. The sites with no children are the ones to watch. They figure we'll consider the sites being "protected" by children are major sites and that any other site isn't worth taking out, and in the process, they'll cause a stalemate with the help of the American left protesting any military action against little kids. It'll be a stall tactic playing on the sympathies of anti-American leftists around the world. Leaders in Iran are psychos, but they ain't stupid.