[Paul C. Jesup]

DBeers: I think you are on a thread about homosexual 'marriage' and objectively you are advocating for homosexual 'marriage' -one aspect of the homosexualization of society... All your other moral relative arguments are flawed and quite transparent...

If you want to poke holes in my opinions, go ahead, but so far you have done no such thing. All you have done is make broad/grand statements with no reasoning, nor examples given for your statements.

[bigsigh]

Before the night is over, we'll be charged with supporting child molesting, shoplifting, and spitting in public.

[DBeers]

If you want to poke holes in my opinions, go ahead, but so far you have done no such thing. All you have done is make broad/grand statements with no reasoning, nor examples given for your statements.

Actually I remain on topic -I oppose homosexual 'marriage' and really I do not have to justify this position logically or any other way for that matter. On FR, the issue (homosexualization of society) is not debated. FR is not a liberal debating society regardless the logic one might employ in the debate (reference my post# 112 to you).