[DBeers]

If you want to poke holes in my opinions, go ahead, but so far you have done no such thing. All you have done is make broad/grand statements with no reasoning, nor examples given for your statements.

Actually I remain on topic -I oppose homosexual 'marriage' and really I do not have to justify this position logically or any other way for that matter. On FR, the issue (homosexualization of society) is not debated. FR is not a liberal debating society regardless the logic one might employ in the debate (reference my post# 112 to you).

[bigsigh]

DB you have to bring a stonger argument other than that two long-term freepers are anti-FR and we can't debate gay marriage because that makes us all of a sudden liberal.

I have asked you about your position being anti freedom etc. What is your response to that?

[Paul C. Jesup]

FR is not a liberal debating society regardless the logic one might employ in the debate (reference my post# 112 to you

I think Rush put is best when he stated that conservatives are logical and liberals are emotional.

You may not like what I have stated, but my statements were made in a sound, rational, logical and polite manner.

You sir have shown that you really have nothing more constructive to say on the issue and instead you have taken to use the FR FAQ as justification that I did not have a right to state my opinions. You're like a lawyer who is trying to find a loophole because you are losing a court case. That is very low of you.