Lexington, Mass., father of 6-year-old arrested, spends night in jail over objections to homosexual curriculum in son's kindergarten class.
Posted on 01/21/2006 8:23:11 PM PST by MediaAnalyst
BALTIMORE -- A Circuit Court judge yesterday ruled that Maryland's 33-year-old ban on same-sex "marriage" is unconstitutional.
- snip -
"After much study and serious reflection, this court holds that Maryland's statutory prohibition against same-sex marriage cannot withstand this constitutional challenge," Judge Murdock said in her 22-page ruling. The law defining marriage as a union of a man and a woman violates the state constitution's Equal Rights Amendment, which guarantees "equality of rights under the law shall not be abridged or denied because of sex," the judge said.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Just leave. And take your DNC talking points with you.
You have little understanding of the words "freedom", "marriage", "government", or the purpose of foundation of law.
You have revealed yourself to be a shill for perversion, someone who can't think straight or reason, but only parrot what he's heard or read on gay websites. You are ruled by emotion, your method of debate is to throw a stink bomb or two, trot out some invective and slogans, and then leave when confronted with the truth.
It's crystal clear to everyone except, maybe, yourself.
I don't support homosexual school curriculum. You make the mistake others make about the "agenda." You can't agrue the merits of an issue that effects adults separately from an issue which effects children. If you read my comments you would have realized I don't support that crap.
You are a homo activist troll... plain and simple... target practice...
"Child molest card"? "Last refuge of scoundrels"? What exactly is your point? YOU'RE the one who brought up NAMBLA - North American MAN BOY Love [sic] Association. Man - Boy - Get it? Homosexual.
Anyone who is not a homosexual or their enforcer knows that the rate of child molestation is much, much higher among homosexuals.
Your point?
When you admit your error, you'll be cleansed and your conscience cleared. Attacking me does not distract the average reader from your denials of the obvious.
He wasn't calling for the end of debate, but for the ejection of a left wing homo activist troll...
"I don't support homosexual school curriculum."
Well, since in the great state of Massachusetts "gay" marriage is now the law of the land because of two rabid judges forcing it down everyone's throats, the public schools now MUST teach the homosexuality is normal and natural and that "gay" marriage is equal to real marriage. The entire cirriculum is now in thrall to the "gay" agenda.
To pretend that "gay" marriage does not affect other people, in this instance school cirricula, is a conscious lie.
I oppose the sex curriculum which has been mentioned on the site hundreds of times. If you think some kids should not find out a teacher is homosexual or see their spouse drop them off in the parking lot, you need to home school and pull the shades.
You can't be THAT dense! Can you?
Sorry for not leaving, the other thread was boring.
That is basically correct. FR is not a liberal debating society. I do not have to be fair to liberal opinions let alone have to read liberal propaganda parroted by trolls on FR.
I myself do not enforce policy here -I did not write FR policy -I simply come here because of it. If the moderators are too busy to deal with that which in my opinion is obviously evidenced on this thread then I will just ping Jim Robinson to it.
You did not address the fact that all public schools in MASS must now promote the "gay" agenda since "gay" marriage legal there, due to TWO - 2 - activist judges.
And your solution, I suppose, would be that people who don't want their children taught that homosexuality is equivalent to normal sexual development is to move out of state.
Your support of the "gay" agenda is based on raw blind emotion.
and....................
There are other webistes which welcome those who support the "gay" agenda. In fact, if we posted our viewpoints there we'd get banned.
You keep assuming I support the "agenda." I've told you dozens of time I don't. You are either a propagandist or you have a learning disability.
When you learn to argue issues without lumping them together in some pile you depsise, you'll be a better poster and you will stop accusing people of having positions they don't hold.
I believe you are now being disingenuous. You called the moderator to "enforce" what you thought were the FR principles and to end the debate because you couldn't. Now you deny it. What's next?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.