Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: oxcart
North Carolina was also backward in other ways: it was reluctant to join the American Revolution, and it was one of the last states to embrace the union after freedom from the British had been won.

They were jealous of their liberties. That was not backwardness.
34 posted on 01/20/2006 3:47:39 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Arkinsaw
There's being jealous and then there's being nuts.

The United States is called United for a reason. The South did violate the Constitution by seceeding; I don't care if they had popular votes in those states or not. Up until the late 1850's the majority of Southerners considered secession to be illegal, which was why no ohter Southern states supported South Carolina during the Nullification Crisis.

Some diehard unreconstructed rebels are just plain unrealistic. The South didn't have the economic means to win the war and got no foreign recognition. I know the Brits gave some aid, but they did so more out of their own self-interest than any real support for the Confederacy (they'd outlawed slavery in 1833). The South's economy was based on slavery; it would have collapsed eventually regardless of what the North might have done. As for the Lincoln bashers, I think any President would have done what Lincoln did to prevent the country from splitting apart.

41 posted on 01/20/2006 3:58:12 PM PST by WestVirginiaRebel (The Democratic Party-Jackass symbol, jackass leaders, jackass supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson