Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CarolinaGuitarman
No, it is not the Law that excludes God from scientific examination . . .

No law could do that. It is not "scientific examination of God" but elimination of theistic considerations from a public academic context by law we are discussing. If you have this much trouble distinguishing the subject under discussion perhaps it is no wonder you confuse atheism for agnosticism..

229 posted on 01/19/2006 4:00:14 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]


To: Fester Chugabrew
"No law could do that. (exclude God from scientific examination)"

"Establishment of the principle that God, by law, must be elimnated from the purview of science, is the issue,"

Make up your mind.

"It is not "scientific examination of God" but elimination of theistic considerations from a public academic context by law we are discussing."

Theistic considerations in science IS the *scientific examination of god*.

"If you have this much trouble distinguishing the subject under discussion perhaps it is no wonder you confuse atheism for agnosticism.."

Coming from you this is comical. You constantly mix up the two. I think it's on purpose; even YOU can't be that dim.

Can you?
232 posted on 01/19/2006 4:06:51 PM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson