All I have ever seen Creationism or ID do is criticize Darwinism. Finding flaws in Darwinism is NOT the same as proving Creationism or ID (and yes, I believe they are the same, just under different names). This is just more of the same.
Why are you demanding that ID be a proven entity; obviously, so called scientists in academe require no such constraint upon themselves in teaching Darwin...the real issue here, once and for all, revolves around our zeal, or lack thereof, of seeking questions and attempting to answer them in an academic environment. When we are scholars, we are at our finest hour in seeking ideas, later on we have to earn our keep in the workaday world and this restrains our perspective. The caterwauling from the evo crowd at the mere thought of introducing material other than orthodoxy (and for them,Darwin has here supplanted the God of the Bible) speaks volumes of their refusal to infuse the academic brew with a desirable spice of variety...