Posted on 01/18/2006 10:37:29 AM PST by neverdem
For those not familiar with these cases ---
Link to -- Presser v. Illinois
Link to --- U.S. v. Miller, et al
Link to ---descriptions of Supreme Court gun cases
The description of Presser doesn't capture the effort by the State of Illinois strategically to restrict RKBA by statute.
The Court's opinion in Cruikshank is a cloud of squid ink, deliberately obscurantist IMHO, but I took the salient points from it that, notwithstanding the enforcement clause of the 14th Amendment, the Court chose to uphold neither the Civil Rights Act of 1866 nor the Enforcement Acts of 1870 (there were two of the latter, the later a refinement of the first), and indeed abrogated any federal role in the incorporation of the "privileges and immunities" clause and the Bill of Rights generally to the States.
They threw the black complainants in the original federal case on the mercy of the white-supremacist government of Louisiana. To the wolves, in other words.
Cruikshank wouldn't withstand inspection for more than about 15 minutes today, again IMHO.
I would be interested in finding where these SVT's would be available at that price.
Thanks
Joe
How about giving Chicago, Milwaukee, and Madison their own state to rule over? It would work out alot better.
Remember... in NY, most Republicans are Democrats, and most Democrats are Greens.
And then the Democrats will spy on those suspected of having guns with out warrants.
You might check through that channel, to FFL's specializing in Russian weapons and accessories. I passed on the SVT bayonet, which was going for approximately the same price as the gun itself (!), and settled for an aftermarket sight mount, the original "clawfoot" issue mounts having been bid up to a ridiculous level like the bayonets.
Blagojevick, you Son of a B.... !!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.