Posted on 01/16/2006 1:26:24 PM PST by Hal1950
Karen Hughes, President Bush’s newest undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and the caretaker of America’s image abroad, has her work cut out for her.
A Zogby survey of 3,900 Arabs in Morocco, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Jordan, and the United Arab Emirates has uncovered massive distrust of U.S. motives in the Middle East.
Unkindest cut of all, Arabs would prefer that President Chirac and France lead the world rather than us, and, rather than have us as the world’s lone superpower, they would prefer the Chinese.
While Arabs are not as rabidly anti-American as in the aftermath of the Iraq invasion, still, by 77 percent to 6 percent, they believe the Iraqi people are worse off today, and by four-to-one, Arabs say the U.S. invasion has increased, not decreased, terrorism.
Designed by Arab scholar Shibley Telhami of the Brookings Institution, the survey reveals pervasive cynicism about the stated goals of George W. Bush. When asked, “When you consider American objectives in the Middle East, what factors do you think are important to the United States?” the Arab answers came as follows:
Fully 76 percent said the Americans are there for the oil, 68 percent said to protect Israel, 63 percent to dominate the region, and 59 percent to weaken the Muslim world. Only 6 percent said we were there to protect human rights and another 6 percent said to promote democracy. Asked directly if they believe President Bush when he says democracy is our goal, two of every three Arabs, 78 percent in Egypt, said that, no, they do not believe Bush.
Asked to name the two nations that present the greatest threat to regional peace, 70 percent named Israel, 63 percent the United States, and 11 percent Britain. Only 6 percent named our bête noire Iran.
Asked to name the foreign leader they disliked most, Sharon swept top honors with 45 percent. Bush took the silver with 30 percent. No one else was close. Tony Blair came in a weak third. Only 3 percent of the Arabs detest him most.
While only 6 percent agreed with al-Qaeda’s aim to establish an Islamic state and only 7 percent approve of its methods, 20 percent admire the way al-Qaeda “stood up for Muslim causes” and 36 percent admire how it “confronts the U.S.”
Favorite news source? Sixty-five percent named Al-Jazeera either as their favorite or second favorite. What Fox News is to red-state America, Al-Jazeera is to the Arab street.
America’s standing in the Arab world could hardly be worse. And the questions the survey raises are these: Do we care? And, if we do, do not the Arabs have a point? Has not U.S. behavior in the Middle East lent credence to the view that our principal interests are Israel and oil, and, under Bush II, that we launched an invasion to dominate the region?
After all, before liberating Kuwait, Secretary of State Baker said the coming war was about “o-i-l.” And while we sent half a million troops to rescue that nation of 1.5 million, we sent none to Rwanda, where perhaps that many people were massacred.
If Kuwait did not sit on an underground sea of oil, would we have gone in? Is our military presence in the Mideast unrelated to its control of two-thirds of the world’s oil reserves?
If human rights is our goal, why have we not gone into Darfur, the real hellhole of human rights? If democracy is what we are fighting for, why did we not invade Cuba, a dictatorship, 90 miles away, far more hostile to America than Saddam’s Iraq, and where human rights have been abused for half a century? Saddam never hosted nuclear missiles targeted at U.S. cities.
And is Israel not our fair-haired boy? Though Sharon & Co. have stomped on as many UN resolutions as Saddam Hussein ever did, they have pocketed $100 billion in U.S. aid and are now asking for a $2 billion bonus this year, Katrina notwithstanding. Anyone doubt they will get it?
Though per capita income in Israel is probably 20 times that of the Palestinians, Israel gets the lion’s share of economic aid. And though they have flipped off half a dozen presidents to plant half a million settlers in Arab East Jerusalem and the West Bank, have we ever imposed a single sanction on Israel? Has Bush ever raised his voice to Ariel Sharon? And when you listen to the talking heads and read the columns of the neocon press, is it unfair to conclude that, yes, they would like to dump over every regime that defies Bush or Sharon?
Empathy, a capacity for participating in another’s feelings or ideas, is indispensable to diplomacy. Carried too far, as it was by the Brits in the 1930s, it can lead to appeasement. But an absence of empathy can leave statesmen oblivious as to why their nation is hated, and with equally fateful consequences.
January 16, 2006 Issue
I know.....
This entire article almost makes me think that Pat Buchanan is mentally ill.....
:)
That just brings a smile to my face....
Hmmm. The United States is hated. That is why so few people from other countries want to come here, and would never risk their lives to do so.
"Please tell me why you continue this slanderous "Jew hater" line."
Slanderous?
Funny, Pat seems to back up the thought every time he speaks.
Show me when and where he has supported Israel.
Buchanan is getting more and more marginalized every single day. Thankfully, he has no effective authority within the government. I put him in the Algore category. LOL
Being opposed to the actions of the STATE of Israel is much different than anti-Semitism. Many Jews in Israel do not support their state's actions in Palestine, much the same as Pat.
You evidently missed my point; on this forum we ONLY "debate" people who deal in FACTS and REALITY.
Your post does neither.
Or do you, Howlin, decide who is a conservative Republican?
Pat's own words and deeds prove he's neither a Republican OR a conservative. He's a Jew hating opportunist who ONLY makes money when he speaks out again this country, the Jews, or George W. Bush.
Please tell me why you continue this slanderous "Jew hater" line.
Because almost every single "article" he writes and every single "interview" he gives ends with a diatribe about Israel.
Tell Pat something for me: tell him I'm a born Presbyterian American and that yes, Israel IS our "fair hair boy."
Slander? Tell him to sue me.
Must one support the actions of the Israeli state in all cases to show one does not hate Jews?
Wow, seven whole posts before outing yourself.
You've been here before, haven't you.
I noticed that; a "life support" Patsie.
Not even smart enough to be able to carry it off.
Jim Noble: Pigs Might Fly Out of My Ass.
Really?
I asked you to show me where he has supported Israel.
You cannot, because he never has.
He has always sided with the so-called Palestinians (who are an invented peopel by the way, they're arabs, no such bird as a Palestinian) no matter what the situation is.
That's a pretty good indicator there.
In his eyes, the 'Palestinians' do no wrong, and Israel defending itself from terrorists is an 'aggressor'.
Get off it, you're starting to smell up the place.
Show me where he has supported them, ever.
Yes, he, from his posts 187 and 189, is against the nation of Israel.
He claims one can be against Israel but 'support Jews'.
I'd love to see him explain this Clintonian side step.
I see there is yet another new freepers who support the increasingly marginalized Buchanan. Who is surely as nutty as Algore.
Yes, Buchanan using Zogby is quite a laugh.
Zogby is an admitted unabashed supporter of anyhing remotely anti-American AND anti-Israel.
Zogby is also, if memory serves, a muslim.
Surprise surprise.
Oh, the Patsies will begin wandering back now; it's an election year, after all.
Where else do they have to go?
To answer your question, one example - the UN resolution that "Sharon & Co" have "stomped on" most glaringly is UN resolution 194, otherwise known as right of return - for Palestinian refugees.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.