What we need to see is the 100 pages that aren't being released!
1 posted on
01/15/2006 5:22:53 PM PST by
wagglebee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: Mia T; Blurblogger; doug from upland; Calpernia
2 posted on
01/15/2006 5:24:05 PM PST by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
Yay, another whitewash. Can't have the people knowing what their government is up to.
3 posted on
01/15/2006 5:24:08 PM PST by
Crazieman
(6-23-2005, Establishment of the United Socialist States of America)
To: wagglebee
4 posted on
01/15/2006 5:24:57 PM PST by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: wagglebee
THis may work against the upcoming dem assertions about pubbies being a culture of .... what is it they say?
To: wagglebee
Where's the NY Times and their leakers on the missing 100 pages?
7 posted on
01/15/2006 5:25:45 PM PST by
jimbo123
To: wagglebee; AliVeritas; Txsleuth; saveliberty; rodguy911; MNJohnnie
8 posted on
01/15/2006 5:26:03 PM PST by
A.Hun
(Common sense is no longer common.)
To: wagglebee
Remember, the republicans aren't the Clinton's ONLY enemies.
We'll see them alright, and probably leaked by a democrat.
9 posted on
01/15/2006 5:26:15 PM PST by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: wagglebee
What we need to see is the 100 pages that aren't being released!But you don't understand!
It's a heinous crime that President Bush would authorize warrantless survellience of al Qaeda contacts, and his doing such merits a full Congressional inquiry and possible impeachment.
But Bill Clinton's meritless use of the IRS to intimidate political enemies should be buried.
I'm shocked that you cannot grasp the Democratic consistency in those two arguments.
10 posted on
01/15/2006 5:26:27 PM PST by
dirtboy
(My new years resolution is to quit using taglines...)
To: wagglebee
Sh*t....sorry....but it's the 100 redacted pages that we MUST have published......where is a LEAKER when you NEED THEM????
11 posted on
01/15/2006 5:26:41 PM PST by
goodnesswins
(Here in the Seattle area.....It's time to build Arks.)
To: Baynative
13 posted on
01/15/2006 5:27:12 PM PST by
goodnesswins
(Here in the Seattle area.....It's time to build Arks.)
To: wagglebee
Exactly! Everyone should call their congress-critters, even the worthless ones,
like mine.........Osama Obama, and DICK Turbin.
14 posted on
01/15/2006 5:27:34 PM PST by
MamaLucci
(Mutually assured destruction STILL keeps the Clinton administration criminals out of jail.)
To: wagglebee
and what does Nancy Pelosi have to say about this culture of corruption?
16 posted on
01/15/2006 5:33:25 PM PST by
SmithL
(Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Lift up your gates and sing, Hosana in the highest! Hosana to your King!)
To: wagglebee
The 100 pages WILL be released, but they will be redacted. Let's see the unredacted versions. But we will probably see enough in the redacted version to see WHAT was going on, but not WHO did it or TO WHOM. Still, this is a great win for Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA). Thank him for standing up to the bullying, lying Dems.
17 posted on
01/15/2006 5:37:20 PM PST by
DeweyCA
To: wagglebee
To my fellow Freepers...this is what I got from my inquiry from one of my Senators...Kay Baily hasn't responded...Dear Mr. XXXX: Thank you for contacting me regarding the Independent Counsel David Barrett's investigation of former Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Henry Cisneros. I appreciate having the benefit of your comments on this matter. As you know, David Barrett was appointed Independent Counsel in 1995 to investigate allegations of false statements made to the Federal Bureau of Investigation by Mr. Cisneros during a background check for his appointment as HUD Secretary. Counsel Barrett recently completed his report, but it has yet to be released to Congress and to the public. Congress passed the Treasury, Transportation, Housing and Urban Development Appropriations Act (H.R. 3058) and on November 30, 2005, President George W. Bush signed it into law (P.L. 109-115). Section 408 of this law contained a provision requiring the court of jurisdiction to release of the report 60 days after enactment of P.L. 109-115. However, this provision restricts the release of any names of individuals related to this investigation based on privacy considerations. I understand your interest in reviewing the report in its entirety, and you may be certain I will keep your thoughts in mind as I continue to monitor this situation. I appreciate having the opportunity to represent you in the United States Senate. Thank you for taking the time to contact me. Sincerely, JOHN CORNYN United States Senator My question Senator is: However, this provision restricts the release of any names of individuals related to this investigation based on privacy considerations.
Privacy...how about good American's right to know....we paid for Barretts investigation...
20 posted on
01/15/2006 5:41:00 PM PST by
RVN Airplane Driver
(Most Americans are so spoiled with freedom they have no idea what it takes to earn and keep it.)
To: wagglebee
DEMOCRAT/HYPOCRITEQUALS ONE
To: wagglebee
Oh, SO NOW they don't want transparency in the White House. Fair game is fair game.
To: wagglebee
If this is real, we've got the beast! I'm cauctiously optimistic, waiting and watching.
23 posted on
01/15/2006 5:59:07 PM PST by
jmaroneps37
(We will never murtha to the terrorists. Bring home the troops means bring home the war.)
To: wagglebee
![](http://rds.yahoo.com/S=96062883/K=bill+clinton/v=2/SID=w/l=IVI/SIG=12pj42rke/EXP=1137463072/*-http%3A//www.screamingpickle.com/fromweb/clinton/bill-clinton_small.jpg)
Bill Clinton could rape a 14 year old on the Capitol steps, and the MSM and Democrats would not bat an eyelash.
But what really makes Democrats nervous is that the redacted material could implicate those who are currently in power, or those seeking higher office. Moreover, previous Clinton toadies have moved on to be staffers for Democrat Senators and Congressmen, as well as other positions in Washington (lobbyists, etc).
What I really hope is exposed is the Clinton administration tactic of using the IRS to harass anyone who got in their way, and the manipulation of Reno's pathetic "Justice" Dept.
![](http://rds.yahoo.com/S=96062883/K=janet+reno/v=2/SID=w/l=IVI/SIG=1280uor9h/EXP=1137463264/*-http%3A//www.granma.cu/fotos1/enero04/RENO%20Janet.jpg)
The MSM will hate this because it will undermine all their hyperactive attempts to paint the Bush administration as "out of control" and "abusing power." The Clinton files could (and I emphasize could) weaken the blatant MSM strategy to help Democrats in 2006.
But, then again, everything associated with the Clinton's is covered up or ignored, and they skate free and clear every time. So, who knows.
25 posted on
01/15/2006 6:03:27 PM PST by
SkyPilot
To: wagglebee
Fasten your seatbelts - It's gonna be a bumpy ride.
26 posted on
01/15/2006 6:11:51 PM PST by
sono
(You can't convert people in pink dresses)
To: wagglebee
I wonder if somebody will "leak" the redacted pages?
27 posted on
01/15/2006 6:15:56 PM PST by
msnimje
(Senate Democrats ----------- Sound and Furry Signifying INSIGNIFICANCE)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson