No kidding that whole exchange was hilarious.
Leaky: Why did you strip search a 10 year old girl
Alito: It was a search warrent to search the premises and anyone on it, the whole argument was a technical one about weather the affidavit was properly filed with the warrent so explain they needed the additional searches.
Leaky: But the courts are there to protect the individual from overreaching government or corperations. I worry you aren't doing that in this case at all. Am I overanalyzing it?
Alito: Yes you are, the cops knew the drug dealer hid drugs on other people in the home, so they asked to search everyone when they got the warrent. I'm not happy they searched the 10yr old girl, I even said that in my decent. This case was weather the cops were liable to be sued. And that wouldn't be possible if there was even the chance that a reasonable officer thought the warrent coverved it.
Leaky: That may be, but who strip searches a 10 year old girl?
Like smacking your head against the wall... only funnier.
Alito: Yes you are, the cops knew the drug dealer hid drugs on other people in the home, so they asked to search everyone when they got the warrent. I'm not happy they searched the 10yr old girl, I even said that in my dissent. This case was weather the cops were liable to be sued. And that wouldn't be possible if there was even the chance that a reasonable officer thought the warrent coverved it.
Leaky: That may be, but who strip searches a 10 year old girl?
Who strip searches a 10 year old girl? A cop who knows that the drug dealer probably hid drugs on her (the drug dealer hoping he would be lucky enough to get a liberal democrat cop that wouldn't dream of searching a child) to avoid getting caught. That's who, you ignorant gasbag!