We have been having a "discussion" about this...and I have said that I would be flattered and would LOVE to know that I was hired because of my looks...BUT,
I think we have all determined that looks would NOT be the "BASIS"...but, that we would otherwise be qualified for a job...I think anyone would feel good to know their looks also played a part.
Surely, you wouldn't NOT want to do business with a pretty woman if she was also qualified in the other ways for the job, would you?
Dolphy mentioned Wall Street. I worked in financial services for nearly 20 years. Dolphy, does your employ have anything to do with financial services (not trying to pry, but if the answer is yes, then I understand completely)
Can you switch to 455.0000? I believe we have a co-located frequency.
No, of course I wouldn't use looks as a disqualifier. I don't want to junk up this thread but I think, knowing your posts on FR, that we would be in agreement if I went into the background that led to my post.