Replies

The dems have not asked one substantive question.
They focused on the Vanguard and search issues while touching on terrorist's rights and unitary executive theories.
basically, they have nothing are are just bloviating about nothing just to hear themselves talk and to appease the move-on/DU/Kos moonbats. They need to keep them happy so the money flows in.

Alito has schooled them (like Roberts) in civics and basic separation of powers topics.
He's been as good as we could have expected so far.
I think the embarrassment they were subjected to by Roberts has them gun shy.
We should expect more of the same garbage from them until the witness portion of the hearings when they have people up there voicing their opinions ( I'm afraid he'll strip my 10yo child so please don't appoint him), which can't be countered with facts.

Recovery addicts watching these hearing probably feel like the LLoyd Bridges character in Airplane whose running line is: "I guess I picked the wrong week to give up..(addiction du jour)"

( I'm afraid he'll strip my 10yo child so please don't appoint him),

The dishonesty of the Dems on this stuff is appalling. As was mentioned by Limbaugh, if Leahy doesn't want 10-year olds strip- searched, why doesn't he introduce a law making it illegal?. Doesn't Leahy care about 10-year-olds scarred for life by the experience?