Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leftist Senator Feinstein on Fox Sunday
Fow news Sunday | Exton

Posted on 01/08/2006 4:31:29 PM PST by Exton1

Did any one else her Leftist Senator Feinstein on Fox Sunday? She was just full of nonsense. For example she said something about its not the Mainstream Conservative that bother me is the Activist Conservatives. So I gather its OK to be a Conservative as long as you do not try to push your views (like the left does) on the Government or its policies. HYPOCRITE.

She then went on about how important it is to keep Roe vs. Wade, and that it is the only test a Supreme Justice should have to pass. She then when on the litany about death to women and yada, yada, yada. Obviously she does not care about a woman’s health, for if she did she would be against Roe vs. Wade because the facts have shown that more women have died from the legal abortion procedures than died when it was illegal. More women have gotten breast cancer and metal illness from abortions, than those who don’t have them. And finally, abortions have basically turned more woman into sluts and helped destroy marriage than would have happened had it not been legalized.

How does that Marxist keep getting elected? Liberalism must be a mental disorder.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; abortion; feinstein; feminists; fns; hag; old; roe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Exton1
If there ever was a time to use the C word, it's when speaking about California senators.


21 posted on 01/08/2006 5:51:17 PM PST by unixfox (AMERICA - 20 Million ILLEGALS Can't Be Wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Better than 85% of the counties in Kalifornia are solid RED. Those few that are blue are the big cities where the majority of the residents depend on the socialist programs supported by the democratic party. This is a populace that has less than 4 days of food, water, and fuel on hand. They have to be supported by big government socialism to survive.
The two witches from Kalifornia cater to the bee hive voters in the cities and the rest of us have no representation. We don't have the votes, and it is easy to see that we just don't count to them.
22 posted on 01/08/2006 5:51:31 PM PST by oldenuff2no
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

It is an attack on all fronts.

Sunday evening, Monday morning water cooler fodder.

Keep changing the focus. Obfuscate to the ignorate.


23 posted on 01/08/2006 6:02:00 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Exton1
Did any one else her Leftist Senator Feinstein on Fox Sunday?

Apparently so:Feinstein

24 posted on 01/08/2006 6:03:13 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShuShu

He has a book out, and it's a hit piece on the Iraq war and the Bush admin. According to him, everyone but Bremer is a complete idiot and incapable of running the war.


25 posted on 01/08/2006 6:11:47 PM PST by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Exton1

She's an activist liberal, so I'm glad she's getting her comeupance.


26 posted on 01/08/2006 6:14:47 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Exton1

It really pisses me off when radical left wing idealogues talk about the "mainstream". They wouldn't know mainstream if it bit them in the ass, but they claim it as their own


27 posted on 01/08/2006 6:22:45 PM PST by csmusaret (Urban Sprawl is an oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldenuff2no

You're partly right. There are also liberal areas that are very wealthy but support the 'Rats on the basis of anti-military and social liberalism. They and the people you speak of have formed an alliance which makes up the majority of Kalifornia voters.


28 posted on 01/08/2006 6:24:56 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (Sam Alito Deserves To Be Confirmed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
If there ever was a time to use the C word, it's when speaking about California senators.

You mean "see you next tuesday"?

29 posted on 01/08/2006 8:12:15 PM PST by Christian4Bush (Over THREE THOUSAND PEOPLE lost their 'civil liberties' on September 11, 2001.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Torie

For the record, I do not agree. There is a difference between politics and law. For that reason there is a tug of war between politicians and judges.


30 posted on 01/08/2006 10:03:28 PM PST by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Politics is why the judges are appointed for life. Our founding fathers new that this could become a political problem, so they gave them life time jobs. The hope that with a mixture of appointees they would make more balanced decisions. The court has been left of center for years. Now is time for the pendulum to swing back. Sometime in the future when the court becomes too conservative, then maybe some President will put on a liberal.
31 posted on 01/09/2006 1:08:17 AM PST by Exton1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Exton1
I find it interesting how the rats are sticking to the talking point they got last year about co-opting the word "activist" and applying it to conservative jurists, as in "activist conservative". Regardless that the two words together make no sense, the rats hope (as they always have) that if they and their allies in the liberal newsrooms repeat the phrase often enough, the mindless chattering class will absorb it and get their arms around it as if it is something real.
32 posted on 01/09/2006 1:22:54 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Regardless that the two words together make no sense, the rats hope (as they always have) that if they and their allies in the liberal newsrooms repeat the phrase often enough, the mindless chattering class will absorb it and get their arms around it as if it is something real.

It is also part of their strategy of turning words on their head to change or obfuscate their meanings. Add some projection to that and we are nearly there. They are activists, as you know, but that name is beginning to have a negative meaning so they now apply it to the conservatives. So, wanting to keep the Constitution the same is activists, which is bad, or if its not bad then the left is good because they are activists. Win, win for the loony left.

33 posted on 01/09/2006 1:48:11 AM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Exton1
Covered on the Sunday Talk Show Thread, also.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1554042/posts?q=1&&page=351

34 posted on 01/09/2006 1:54:21 AM PST by mathluv (Bushbot, Snowflake, Dittohead ---- Bring it on!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Exton1
What was really stupid was when she referred to the three branches of government as the White House, the Senate, and The Congress (rather than the Executive, Legislative, and the Judicial).

The scary thing is that she either believes that she's correct, or that we (Americans) are too stupid to know better.

Of course, on one corrected her.
35 posted on 01/09/2006 9:05:21 AM PST by conservativeharleyguy (Democracy can withstand almost anything, except Democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativeharleyguy

FWIW the entire thread on Feinstein quitting the Senate subcommittee under a cloud of war profiteering [see Rush and WorldNetDaily] has been removed from FreeRepublic two days in a row!!!I am really getting spooked and wonder what is happening to our free speech rights??!!


36 posted on 03/30/2007 12:29:17 PM PDT by righteousindignation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: kjo

She's a moron.


Ah yes, but has a husband worth 100's of millions....AND much of it from former interests in "helping his country" in Iraq??? LOL....


37 posted on 03/30/2007 12:31:24 PM PDT by litehaus (A memory tooooo long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson