So does John Woodamorpe. So I guess it is one expert's opinion against another.
No, it isn't, because it's easy to identify the errors and false claims that Woodmorappe makes. You don't have to just flip a coin and decie which "expert" to believe, you can examine the strength of their claims yourself, and find out who knows what he's talking about and who's incompetent and/or dishonest. Woodmorappe, like almost every "creation scientist", has been caught screwing up, and misrepresenting sources, countless times over the years:
Geochronology kata John WoodmorappeHow Good Are Those Young-Earth Arguments? Additional Topics: Woodmorappe's list of "bad" dates
How Can Woodmorappe Sell Us a Bill of Goods if He Doesn't Know the Costs?
More Classic Misquotations in Woodmorappe (1999)
<<<<
No, it isn't, because it's easy to identify the errors and false claims that Woodmorappe makes. You don't have to just flip a coin and decie which "expert" to believe, you can examine the strength of their claims yourself, and find out who knows what he's talking about and who's incompetent and/or dishonest. Woodmorappe, like almost every "creation scientist", has been caught screwing up, and misrepresenting sources, countless times over the years:
>>>>
Of course Woodmorappe has not remained silent and has responded to the critics with his own rebuttals as in here :
Misuse of Woodmorappes List Of Discrepant Isotopic Dates
http://www.trueorigin.org/ca_jw_02.asp
and here :
http://www.trueorigin.org/ca_jw_01.asp