Posted on 01/08/2006 12:31:29 PM PST by paulat
Oh, golly...I DO lust after a CRV....
We got an '06 CR-V about 3 weeks ago. I like it a lot more than I thought I would. Unfortunately my wife drove it for the first time today and I may never see the inside of it again.
I drove a Toyota until I found out they were paying off Jesse Jackson. I then switched to Honda - good decision.
I like the Solstice a lot, and it's great to see a Detroit car that can hold its own against the MX-5 and doesn't need incentives to sell. But a 2-seat roadster is such a niche vehicle that awards like this usually won't go to it.
I've owned 7 Hondas and they were all dependable.
I may have to trade in my S2000 on the 260hp version of the Solstice. Very, very nice!
My Pilot was made in Canada. I should probably check under the hood for anti-Bush propaganda.
I really love Hondas but I think the Ridgeline is hideous-looking
Yup, the Ridgeline is ugly. Looks a little like the Chevy Avalanche, which I also thought was ugly.
That's odd. We compared the RAV4 and the CRV a year ago and found the CRV the roomier of the two. We didn't buy either, as we have a 1999 Camry that we cannot find any excuse to replace. She's a keeper!
1987 Accord with 189,00 miles runs like a champ!
Very ugly.
Our "old" union hall (we've since moved production to Mexico, Korea and China) used to be full of brand-new Avalanche's.
Now, the lot is empty.
That's odd. We compared the RAV4 and the CRV a year ago and found the CRV the roomier of the two. We didn't buy either, as we have a 1999 Camry that we cannot find any excuse to replace. She's a keeper!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'm enjoying the 2006 CRV but I now understand that the 2006 RAV4 has a V6 (269 HP), third row, longer wheel base, and is wider. I also understand that the 2007 CRV will also have a third row, V6, longer wheel base and wider stance. It seems that Honda is a year behind Toyota in this competition.
In retrospect, I should've pulled the trigger on the 2006 RAV4 or waited for the 2007 CRV instead of purchasing the 2006 CRV--which is not a bad car at all. Oh well, that's the way it goes. I'll just have to be content with my CRV for the next 10 years (12-15 yrs is the minimum useful life for a Honda when maintained...perhaps longer) when the CRV becomes my daughter's college car.
I'm frugal with my money, so buying a V6 for the kind of driving I do is not necessary. The 4-cylinder is less expensive to start with and less expensive to run.
I also think the seats in the Hondas are not as comfortable, but then I drive a Camry and that's what I'm used to.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The best SUV that I ever had was the Highlander (Camry platform). I traded it in in 2004 for a Sequoia to capitalize on the SUV/Light truck tax loophole. Unfortunately, the Highlander wasn't heavy enough to qualify for a light truck. The Highlander was smooth as silk and you would never know that you were driving a midsize SUV. It was the best and probably still the best midsize non-luxury line SUV.
And mine is paid-for-in-full since 1989!!!
Fast....relative to what? Would that be walking?
...from components made in Japan which is where all the profits go.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.