That's odd. We compared the RAV4 and the CRV a year ago and found the CRV the roomier of the two. We didn't buy either, as we have a 1999 Camry that we cannot find any excuse to replace. She's a keeper!
That's odd. We compared the RAV4 and the CRV a year ago and found the CRV the roomier of the two. We didn't buy either, as we have a 1999 Camry that we cannot find any excuse to replace. She's a keeper!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'm enjoying the 2006 CRV but I now understand that the 2006 RAV4 has a V6 (269 HP), third row, longer wheel base, and is wider. I also understand that the 2007 CRV will also have a third row, V6, longer wheel base and wider stance. It seems that Honda is a year behind Toyota in this competition.
In retrospect, I should've pulled the trigger on the 2006 RAV4 or waited for the 2007 CRV instead of purchasing the 2006 CRV--which is not a bad car at all. Oh well, that's the way it goes. I'll just have to be content with my CRV for the next 10 years (12-15 yrs is the minimum useful life for a Honda when maintained...perhaps longer) when the CRV becomes my daughter's college car.