Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats To Delay Alito's Committee Confirmation Vote
wchs6 ^ | Jan 5, 2006 | staff

Posted on 01/05/2006 2:46:12 PM PST by wouldntbprudent

Samuel Alito faces a delay in his confirmation. Senate aides say Democrats plan to force at least a one-week delay in the Judiciary Committee vote on his nomination to the Supreme Court.

(Excerpt) Read more at wcsh6.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; obstructionistdems
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Mo1

the rules allow it.

what I am more interested in is what they do with this week. I don't think any more attacks against Alito will give them any traction. what they will go for now, is some kind of under the table attacks against the weak republican votes needed to sustain 50 for the constitutional option. any dirt they have, any private investigator results, they are going to use this week - to present that privately to these senators in exchange for them flipping their votes to break the filibuster.

do they have enough dirt to do it? who knows.


21 posted on 01/15/2006 2:55:58 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

These "glass bowls" will never learn.


22 posted on 01/15/2006 2:56:45 PM PST by tiredoflaundry (I'll admit it , I'm a Snow Flake !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Emmet Fitzhume
Anyone have a list of those on board for a fillibuster?

It's not a filibuster .. in the rules the Dems can delay the vote for one week

They are trying to delay this appointment to the court because there are a couple big cases coming up

23 posted on 01/15/2006 2:56:47 PM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
They are trying to delay this appointment to the court because there are a couple big cases coming up

Proving that Judge Alito will be addressed as Justice Alito very soon !

24 posted on 01/15/2006 2:58:35 PM PST by tiredoflaundry (I'll admit it , I'm a Snow Flake !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
play right into the hands of President Bush...it might have been better to have them filibuster...but, this will do.

The Dems don't want a filibuster because they know in the long run it will hurt them

They are delaying because of a couple big cases to be heard in the USSC and they don't want Alito on the bench

They would rather take their chances with O'Connor

25 posted on 01/15/2006 2:59:41 PM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

I would tell Dingy Harry he could delay the vote for a week, but for every week of delay their would be a year delay for anything that slug wanted to bring for a vote.


26 posted on 01/15/2006 3:14:34 PM PST by Beagle8U (An "Earth First" kinda guy ( when we finish logging here, we'll start on the other planets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Correct me if I'm wrong. As I understood it, the Dem's already had their week when the hearing was rescheduled. I believe it was to begin right after the new year. At least that was what I thought I heard at the end of the hearings.
27 posted on 01/15/2006 3:17:46 PM PST by rirepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: wouldntbprudent
I think that the democrats want to use it as nothing but a campaign tool in their State of the Union response.

I guarantee they'll use it to get free air time to attempt to bring public opposition to the judge.

Also, they didn't want him to actually be on the floor with the other justices during the address, which would be a read as a victory for the president.
28 posted on 01/15/2006 3:18:15 PM PST by AlGone2001 (He's not a baby anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rirepublican
Yes, technology they had a delay .. but that was not the one week rule delay they are pulling now
29 posted on 01/15/2006 3:21:59 PM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: wouldntbprudent
They're trying to delay the inevitable. Its a sign of the Democrats' unhinged desperation.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

30 posted on 01/15/2006 3:24:18 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wouldntbprudent

I thought spectator threatened to cancel the break for the committee if they followed through with this.


31 posted on 01/15/2006 3:28:23 PM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shield
Shocking!!

/sarcasm

32 posted on 01/15/2006 3:46:45 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper ("Tucker Carlson could reveal himself as a castrated, lesbian, rodeo clown ...wouldn't surprise me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
They are delaying because of a couple big cases to be heard in the USSC and they don't want Alito on the bench

Two words, "parental notification". That's what the USSC will be tackling in the near future.

33 posted on 01/15/2006 3:51:34 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper ("Tucker Carlson could reveal himself as a castrated, lesbian, rodeo clown ...wouldn't surprise me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

The delay is to let the smear ads run. I'd like the R's to invoke the nuclear option prior to this act that would eliminate the judicial filibuster if they want to delay the vote.

politics ain't beanbag


34 posted on 01/15/2006 3:54:53 PM PST by saveliberty (Proud to be Head Snowflake, Bushbot and a new member of Sam's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty
The delay is to let the smear ads run.

Yep. And also allow our leftist media more time to schedule hand-wringing pundits to blather on about how Alito will single handedly overturn Roe and start a nation wide campaign of strip searching all little girls.

35 posted on 01/15/2006 4:37:50 PM PST by prairiebreeze (Take the high road. You'll never have to meet a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Gunder
He is the chairman, and that's precisely the problem.
36 posted on 01/15/2006 4:39:32 PM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("Liberals aren't neighborhood people." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fhlh

I just wish that our Republican legislators would remember the first rule of politics:

1. Never, ever, ever make deals with Democrats. NEVER! As with satan, they can never be trusted. Their motive is to lie, cheat, kill, and destroy.


37 posted on 01/15/2006 4:45:04 PM PST by Hoodat ( Silly Dems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

One week is time enough to spend the millions they collected from the liberal loonies for ads attacking Alito.

The media has been promised this windfall from the Dems, and the Dems are going to make sure their co-conspirators get their money.


38 posted on 01/15/2006 4:50:36 PM PST by airborne (If being a Christian was a crime, would there be enough evidence to convict you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: shield; Cboldt
They need to nuke 'em, before it's too late.

This is the perfect opportunity.

39 posted on 01/15/2006 4:51:31 PM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("Liberals aren't neighborhood people." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty

Many of us would like to see the "nuclear" option exercised to end judicial filibuster, but we also know that there's not enough "Rs" with the guts.


40 posted on 01/15/2006 6:27:57 PM PST by TheBattman (Islam (and liberalism)- the cult of Satan and a Cancer on Society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson