Posted on 01/04/2006 12:23:05 PM PST by Salem
This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48151
Monday, January 2, 2006
The unseen terrorism
By Joseph Farah
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com
I wonder how much terrorism is really happening inside the United States.
I mean, if terrorism was actually reported, actually chronicled, actually recognized, would we be shocked by just how much is occurring right here in our own back yard?
This thought came to mind last week when I read the very first comprehensive story of an incident that occurred Dec. 18 in Chandler, Ariz.
You probably heard something about it.
Here's the way the story was initially reported by the Associated Press, the largest news-gathering organization in the world:
Authorities say a former home improvement store employee drove his car through the entrance of a Home Depot and lit the car on fire in the paint department.
Though the car almost struck an employee, no one was injured. Firefighters were able to contain the fire within 20 minutes, officials said.
The driver was identified as 24-year-old Ali Warrayat of Gilbert. He was arrested on suspicion of aggravated assault and arson of an occupied structure.
The story went on to explain that police weren't sure what Warrayat's motivations were.
A day later, the mystery continued. The Arizona Republic followed up on the attack by reporting: "Police were still searching Monday for the motive of a man who allegedly drove his car through the front doors of a Home Depot early Sunday."
It was not until late last week that a local newspaper, the East Valley Tribune, finally reported details that gave the public some insight into Warrayat's motivations.
Here's what we learned from that report:
Now, on the basis of what you know about Warrayat, are his motivations all that much of a mystery to you?
Should this incident not be regarded as domestic terrorism?
What would it the suspect have to do or say to be regarded as an ally of al-Qaida and the Islamo-fascists who have declared war on America?
Once again, we see law enforcement officials and the press establishment going out of their way to downplay even the possibility of terrorism. How many times have we seen it? How many times do we have to see it before we recognize the trend?
I could recite, off the top of my head, at least a dozen other examples of the way government officials and their accessories in the media have turned a blind eye to the obvious so as not to see the truth.
In fact, think of all the incidents from power outages to explosions at refinery plants to thefts of munitions in which authorities quickly dismissed any connection to terrorism, even before they had a clue as to the real cause or motive.
Could it be we have far more enemies within than any of us ever figured?
Joseph Farah is founder, editor and CEO of WND and a nationally syndicated columnist with Creators Syndicate. His latest book is "Taking America Back." He also edits the weekly online intelligence newsletter Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, in which he utilizes his sources developed over 30 years in the news business.
True, but the next freelancer may not be so stupid, and may be much more effective in making their "statement". I can think of half dozen ways to create lots of mayhem, and another dozen by breakfast tomorrow. Am I going to write those into a public forum? No way Jose.
Ok. How do we fight against freelancers? Keep in mind that Tim McVeigh was no muslim (although there are theories that he worked with them).
It is hardly pointless. We are not engaged in a war on terrorism. We are engaged in a war on Islam. Be prepared for more of this. Farah's article is a warning. Unfortunately, too many will not heed it.
Maybe you missed this part:
I recall how any possibility that the Beltway sniper attacks were connected with terrorism was dismissed. It turned out they were carried out by two Muslims.His point is that the FedGov is denying these are linked to terrorism when they are. Al Qaeda isn't a country club, you don't apply for a membership. Anyone who has sympathy for their "cause" and works to further that cause, IMHO, is a terrorist. All of the above were terrorist attacks, no matter how much the MSM or the FedGov wants to spin it.I recall how a July 4 shooting attack on an El Al ticket counter in Los Angeles International Airport by an Egyptian Muslim was characterized as not connected with terrorism.
I recall the would-be bomber arrested at the Oklahoma University football game a few months ago that had no connection to terrorism.
I recall there just couldn't possibly have been a Mideast connection to the Oklahoma City bombing.
I recall how TWA Flight 800 just blew up for no particular reason after takeoff from New York.
How do we fight freelancers in this war? You want to go house to house searching for Korans?
He went by the name Tim Osman.
Osama himself used the name Osman on occaision.
Nobody understands Islam like the Christian Arabs.
He has a problem with the government's meaning of the word "connected". It's too bad some of these nut cases are not "connected" since that would make it easier to stop them.
Seems to me that if he was a muslim he would have been proud of it like the rest of these murderers.
Once he was picked up, everything he said was under wraps.
We were told that he said some things, but we were told that the center fuel tank exploded on TWA 800.
It's possible, too,
That WorldNetDaily's constant
fearmongering and
paranoia and
bizarro stories do more
to destabilize
the peace of mind of
the tin foil types who read it
than do terrorists.
Crap he had every opportunity in the world to witness for Allah. I wasn't "told" anything. I saw him myself on the TV. Why didn't he say this was done for jihad?
But I'll assume that was what he was hoping for.
Plot to kill Howard
By KATIE LAPTHORNE
December 17, 2005 (snip)
TERROR suspects talked chillingly about killing John Howard and his family as payback for the deaths of innocent Muslims, a court heard yesterday.
The conversation between accused would-be suicide bomber Abdulla Merhi and his spiritual leader Abdul Nacer Benbrika was covertly recorded in September last year.
The pair allegedly discussed taking "an eye for an eye" and how kafirs (non-believers) had taken over the world.
Merhi told the alleged leader of the Melbourne terror cell: "I want in on everything. If there is anything you talk to me, all right? I am not going to talk anymore."
The 20-year-old allegedly asked Benbrika how to respond if the Prime Minister was to cause the death of innocent Muslim families.
"Do we have to kill him and his family ... his people like at the football?" he said.
Benbrika replied: "If he kill our kids ... we kill (inaudible) little kids."
Prosecutor Nick Robinson said the pair spoke of committing violent jihad in the name of Allah and believed the doors of heaven would be opened to them for doing so.
Merhi said on the tape his eyes had recently been opened and a message had to be sent.
"I have made my point. If it comes up I will go but I am not waiting 20 years or two years," he said.
Benbrika said innocent ones could be the victims: "Because he kills our innocent ones ... that is it. An eye for an eye."
He also encouraged the younger man to do a "big thing" close to railway stations....
http://dailytelegraph.news.com.au/story/0,20281,17588818-5001021,00.html
I wonder if it was a fuzzy pink koran.
Yep!
Just curious, which part do you find amusing? The koran itself, my musings upon it, or both?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.