The answer is no. And the media will continue to bemoan that Vince's knee was down, thus the t.d. shouldn't have happened. It was a bad call, but so was the fact Kelson's interception wasn't deemed valid, but called incomplete for the same reason. The refs didn't chose to review either play and neither team called timeouts insisting they do so.
AND I'M SICK TO DEATH OF THIS BEING CALLED A FRIGGIN' THREE-PEAT! ASK LSU, WHO WON THE BCS CHAMPIONSHIP TROPHY IN 2004 IF THEY THINK THE MEDIA HAS RE-WRITTEN HISTORY. THIS IS USC'S 2ND TRY AT A NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP AND I'M SICK OF THE LIES.
"AND I'M SICK TO DEATH OF THIS BEING CALLED A FRIGGIN' THREE-PEAT! ASK LSU, WHO WON THE BCS CHAMPIONSHIP TROPHY IN 2004 IF THEY THINK THE MEDIA HAS RE-WRITTEN HISTORY. THIS IS USC'S 2ND TRY AT A NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP AND I'M SICK OF THE LIES."
A-men, brother!
Nicely colored font.
Excellent rant.
Noticed didja? I thought tackling by the offensive line was legal in the Rose Bowl?
Nonsense, it was a split national championship. And frankly both were bogus, just winners of a beauty contest and a single game each, not a real playoff to determine a championship.
The AP national championship has been, and will be around longer than the BCS....
like next year.