Those who play his circular/tangent argument games are drawn into this never-ending spiel, one that gives him a bully pulpit for his unconstitutional theories.
You noticed that too? I suspect that - like me - you've lurked on FR for a while before joining : )
Paulsen & I go waaay back. Many of his ilk, -- and mine, - have been here since the beginning.
I type rather slowly, so in 2006 I resolve to spend less time at work posting to FR. That means less time trying to convince the unconvinceable.
The paulsen types here at FR can never be 'convinced', -- as their agenda is one of agit-prop.
They agitate/incite in order to spread propaganda for their unconstitutional 'cause'..
Nasty little game they play, but fighting it can be amusing..
But exposing such people for what they are is priceless. And in a small way gets the point out.
I have made several points. Merely responding to my posts is not the same as convincingly addressing the main points within.
The paulsen types here at FR can never be 'convinced', -- as their agenda is one of agit-prop. They agitate/incite in order to spread propaganda for their unconstitutional 'cause'.
Or maybe it's some sort of extreme performance art where the artists know they're wrong, so they use repetition rather than reason to drive a point home. Kind of like the Fred Phelps "God hates fags" crowd, although not as extreme or shocking.