To: robertpaulsen
If it's moving interstate, they sure can. The Commerce Clause gives them that power. I get it. You expect me to argue in circles by AGAIN replying that if it's not moving interstate, they can't. Then you'll reply with the questionable "substantial effect" rule. I, in turn, differentiate between "substantial" and "any," you ignore the substance of my reply and go off on a tangent. Very predictable. You stated your case repeatedly, but I've actually MADE mine, so I'll cut my losses here.
223 posted on
01/05/2006 10:57:32 AM PST by
Freedom_no_exceptions
(No actual, intended, or imminent victim = no crime. No exceptions.)
To: Freedom_no_exceptions; robertpaulsen
Well done.. You've described in a few words paulsens juvenile 'debating' tactics.
Those who play his circular/tangent argument games are drawn into this never-ending spiel, one that gives him a bully pulpit for his unconstitutional theories.
To: Freedom_no_exceptions
I have no idea what you're arguing. I simply respond to your posts. If you have a point, you sure haven't made one yet.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson